Laserfiche WebLink
2. <br />streets will need to be reconstructed. The City Council has authorized a pavement <br />management program to enable the city to determine how to maintain its roads most cost <br />effectively and at what point the roads should be reconstructed to ensure the most cost <br />effective use of the city's roadway dollars. <br />Given that public improvement projects (i.e. sewer projects) have been funded <br />substantially through special assessments in the past; it is staff s recommendation that, <br />when city streets are reconstructed independently of sewer projects, assessments should <br />be a major funding source. <br />MSA Roadway Funding Issues <br />MSA roads are somewhat different from regular city streets in that they can be 93% <br />funded by MSA funds. Fhere are two funding issues related to MSA roads, one minor <br />and one major. The minor issue is that MSA funds cover approximately 93 % of the <br />costs. The remaining 7% including portions of storm sewer, bike trail and easement <br />costs must be funded by other sources. These alternate funding sources are discussed in <br />the attached memo dated May 20, 1994. <br />The more significant funding issue is that the amount of MSA roads that will need <br />reconstruction in future years will exceed the amount of MSA funds available to the city. <br />This is especially true given the large costs projected for the County 6 reconstruction <br />project. As with non-MSA roads, the city will reach the point were the MSA roads <br />deteriorate to such an extent that it is either impractical or not cost effective to conduct <br />continuous maintenance and repair activities related to these roads, and it will be <br />necessary to reconstruct them. Because the city’s allocation of MSA funds will not be <br />sufficient to fund this reconstruction, the city needs to consider other funding sources. <br />There are two major additional sources of funding available to the city. These are <br />special assessments and property taxes. <br />A. Special Assessments <br />Special assessments are charged to the properties that benefit from the public <br />improvement project. The amount of the special assessment is limited to the <br />amount by which the value of the property is increased by the project. The <br />advantage of special assessments is that they are targeted toward those who <br />directly benefit from the project. The disadvantage of special assessments, in <br />addition to the limitation on the amount which can be assessed, is that whether <br />the adjacent property owners are in support of or in opposition to the specific <br />project, they are generally in opposition to being assessed for a portion of the <br />costs. <br />B. Property Tax <br />Property taxes can be used as a revenue source for public improvement projects <br />in two ways. They can be used on a pay-as-you-go basis. For example, <br />sufficient property taxes are levied to cover the cost of projects completed in the <br />current year. Or, if a bonding program is used as the funding method, the <br />property taxes are levied to cover the portion of the current year’s debt service