05-08-1995 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

^'ly t 'A REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: April 24, 1995 ITEM NO.: 7 Department Approval: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Title Building & Zoning Administrator Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: Zoning Item Description: #2009 Tom and Maureen Palm. 1685 Concordia Street - Variances Resolution Additional ExhibUs^^^ Acknowledgement Forms/Notes of Approval/Telephone Messages of Approval Brief Review of Application The applicants have advised that they would not proceed with the major renovation and second story addition to the 20.5’ x 54.3 ’ structure. Various builders contacted by applicants advised against the original proposal of improvement and recommended a rebuild. Please review applicant’s statement. Exhibit B-1. The applicants amended proposal involves the relocation of the principal structure to a 50’ lakeshore setback in line with the average lakeshore setback line, review Exhibit L. The proposed lakeside deck at 10’ x 30 would extend 10’ in front of the average lakeshore setback line. Review Exhibit N, the elevations show bay windows and a covered porch entrance at the lakeside of the residence. The Planning Commission advised applicants that additions to the lakeside were considered part of the principal structure and would have to meet the proposed 50’ lakeshore setback. Applicaius aereed that the structure would be moved 3’ to the street or to the east to meet the 50’ setback, planning Commission also noted the hardcover decreases were reflected in all setback areas as cited in the staff memo of April 7, 1995 and Exhibit M, 1-3. The applicant asks that you review his statement of unique findings and hardships comparing the benefits of the amended application over the original proposal approved by the City in December of 1994 (Exhibit B-2). Five of the seven member Planning Commission recommended approval of the application as proposed subject to the condition that the covered entry porch and bay window at the lakeside of the residence meet the required 50’ setback from the shoreline. The Plamun Commission approved new construction of a 30 ’ x 46 ’ two-story residence to be l^ated 5»- from the shoreline, the 10’ deck would be located 40 ’ from the shoreline and extend 10 in irr-.s of the average lakeshore setback line and new hardcover improvements in the 0-75’ setback area proposed at'986 s.f. or 25% (existing = 28%). and in Ihe 75-250’ setback area proposed at 2,901 s.f. or 32.4% (existing = 33%). Hardcover in the 250-500’ setback area is reduced to a conforming 34% (existing = 40%).