Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Council Action continued <br />page 2 of 3 <br />Ap^il 5. 1995 <br />Recommendation to Allow Shelters <br />rezoning the propert>- to a commercial district fearful that if a shelter was to fail, the property <br />would now be opened to other commercial uses that would not be as compatible to the adjacent <br />residential area. If there was to be commercial rezoning, it should be considered under a <br />comprehensive smdy or possible redevelopment of the Navarre area. <br />The Planning Commission determined that the zoning must remain residential and the use <br />allowed under a conditional use permit w ith appropriate controls. Review' E.xhibit C, Gaffron s <br />memo of 3/13/95 lists many of the criteria discussed by both Planning Commission members, <br />visitors, and residents during both the February work session and the public information <br />meeting After discussion of the necessaiy contents and criteria to be included in an amendment <br />of the code, it appeared that the use would be compatible at the site proposed by the applicant. <br />In fact the Planning Commission intends to survey areas of the City to determine the number <br />of properties that would qualify for shelter use based on the final established controls and <br />standards, during the amendment process. <br />Review Exhibits G and H, the minutes of the public information meeting and the notification <br />map, 205 residents received written notification of the meeting of March 7th and approximately <br />35 to 40 people were in attendance. There appeared to be no organized opposition to the <br />proposed use. Many of the questions raised by the residents were the very same questions raised <br />by Planning Commission members during the work session discuss ’ons. Planning Commission <br />members were comfortable fielding the questions raised by residents now that they were more <br />familiar with the subject matter. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />Pages 10 and 11 of the minutes of the March 7th public information meeting contain the <br />indWidual recommendations of each of the seven Planning Commission members. Their <br />recommendation asks that the zoning remain residential and that a conditional use permit be <br />developed that would not only provide the necessary protection of the existing residential <br />surrounding neighborhood but would enable the success of a shelter at the proposed location. <br />Many felt although we were unable to document immediate shelter needs in the Orono <br />community or its contract cities, domestic problems exist every where; and that once located in <br />the community the shelter would be available to serve the needs of the commumty. <br />Next Steps/Timeline <br />The applicant has advised staff that the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency will extend the grant <br />award to fund the purchasing and remodeling of the building until the end of August. Based on <br />Council ’s directive on this request, staff would schedule a public hearing for the proposed zonmg <br />amendment in early May and bring the final draft of the amendment back to the Council at their <br />meeting on May 22nd. Once the code amendment is finalized, the applicant may file the