My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-10-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
04-10-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 9:07:55 AM
Creation date
10/6/2023 9:05:18 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. <br />5. <br />A. <br />B. <br />C. <br />The property is a long narrow lot measuring 140' in width and totalling <br />2.3 acres in area. The majority of hardcover improvements are located <br />within the 7^-250’ setback area. <br />Hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area shall be reduced by a 132 s.f. <br />or 0.507c. <br />There is 0% hardcover in the 0-75’ setback; there is a 7.16% hardcovc’- <br />in the 250-500’ setback area where 30% is allowed; and 7.17% in the <br />500-1,000’ setback area where 35% is allowed. <br />The sloping lake yard topography and mature forested area in the west <br />yard already places visual impacts upon the views of the adjacent <br />properties. <br />The sloping topography minimizes the impact of the strucmral <br />improvements to the lakeside of the residence upon the residence to the <br />west side. The lake views of the property at the east side are impacted by <br />the mature plantings in the lakeshore yard. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property <br />right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.