Laserfiche WebLink
♦ <br />Ronald Moorse <br />February 9, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />3. The projected number of RECs (residential equivalent connections) at present and for the <br />years 2000 and 2010. <br />4, Projected increases in sewered RECi and population for each of the next five years. <br />^ £2 projected wastewater flows in the years 2000 and 2010 for the entire city and the <br />S jndjvjdual interceptor service areas. Include a description as to how the flows were calculated <br />including the per capita design flows. <br />' 6. A description and summary of the reasons for on-site s>’stem failure or potential failure for <br />each area to be served. The information for the city of Forest Lake that was previously sent you <br />- * indicates the type of information needed. <br />7. Consideration given to alternative means of service to these areas, eg. community drainfields. <br />Description of how service will be provided and points of connection to existing sewers. <br />^ 2,^/0 '9. Capacity and design flows for lateral and trunk sewers as well as new lift stations. <br />10 10. Sewer construction timetable. <br />11 11. Method of assessment. Has any of the proposed area already been assessed? <br />I2'A ^2. Summary of city’s adopted objectives, policies and strategies for preventing and reducing <br />’ ^ excessive infiltration and inflow in the local sanitary sewer system including standards for new <br />]2-c , ajjjj programs for identifying and reducing excessive I/I. The city should have an <br />ordinance prohibiting the connection of roof drains and sump pumps to the sanitary sewer system. <br />1 — A A C t> Sunitnary of the city’s requirements for on-site sewage disposal systems including installation, <br />^ ' ' * biennial inspection of all existing systems by certified personnel, permit record keeping, li^nsing, <br />maintenance and remedial actions. The Council s policy is that all systems be inspected biennialy <br />by MPCA certified personnel. New s>’stems must meet Minn. Regs. 7080. <br />H 14. Council records indicate that the city has amended its comprehensive plan to incorporate the <br />Council ’s Interim Strategy for the Reduction of Nonpoint Source Pollution and will amend its <br />land use conlroU to implement the policy by May, 1995. Is the city on track to complete this task <br />by May? <br />15. There are several city development policies of concern to the Council. These are the city s <br />land use polices for future development, and y plans for handling/treatment of wastewater and <br />transportation to ser\'e this development. Also, the city s plan for expanding life-cycle and <br />affordable housing is a Council concern. <br />The city’s current plan indicates that development in the area outside the MUSA is currently <br />planned for 2-acre lots served by on-site sanitary disposal systems. Given the number of units, <br />planned densities and local soil conditions, the Council is concerned about the pollution of