03-13-1995 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Request for Council Action continued Page 3 March 9, 1995 #1997 Jon and Sally Lebedoff, 1101 Femdale Road West Section 10 03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Structural coverage Total lot area = 8,481 s.f. Allowed = 1,500 s.f. Existing = 2,513.8 s.f. or 29.6%* Proposed = 2,345 s.f. or 27.6% ♦Per Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C-1), the following shall be included in calculations for lot coverage: All roofed structures which extend more than 6 ’ above grade level. Roofed patio area at the lakeside of the residence, the roofed carport and roofed patio area to the street side of residence are all included in strucmral coverage. List of Exhibits Please refer to the staff memo dated February 13, 1995. Additional Exhibits Submitted with Amended Proposal R - Amended Hardcover Fact Sheet 0-75’ Setback Area S - Amended Hardcover Fact Sheet 75-250’ T - Analysis of Area of Two Story Structure U - Robert Mitchell Letter of 3/6/95 V - Amended Survey Brief Review of Application Please refer to the staff memo of February 13, r >5 and the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting for more detail and background on uiis review. Applicants propose the removal of the existing single story structure and to construct a iwo story strucmre. The struchire will be 38 ’ wid'*, 60’ along the west side and 62 ’ along the east side (additional 2’ needed for garage entrance along street side of residence). Review Exhibit P, there are no height problems. Review Exhibit N, the original proposal presented to the Planning Commission proposed a 20’ setback from the main lake at the southwest comer. The DNR in their review asked that the stmcture be pulled back a minimum of 25’. Review Exhibit U. By moving the structure 5’ to the nonh, there is now a 5’ encroachment within the 75’ setback from the lagoon. Applicant is unable to relocate the stmcmre to the east because of the potential encroachment of the flood plain. Applicant’s attorney, Bob Mitchell, advised that the Bagley residence is located 10+’ from the lot line and that an overhead arbor or roofed stmcture extends from a rear laundry room area to lot line. The existing stmcture is at O’. The original proposal presented to Planning Commission showed a 1’ setback. The amended proposals shows a 2-1-" setback.