Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Zoning File #1911 <br />March 16. 1994 <br />Page 3 <br />poss,b.c ^giMrauon oflands Cch„k-,1 <br />x‘.a wu. .„.pa. ..ne bc.. .... <br />the ctxle sections listed abi)ve <br />Mike Gaffron has prepared vanous exhibits to bluff, <br />determination of a blutf impact zone an ® '■ - ^ j-j- this case is the <br />in an average slope exceeding 18% (9 nse in 50 ). <br />and recommendation. <br />Thi. i. the second arplicat.on of your March <br />areas upon proposed budding sites. restrictive guidelines in the <br />p..ssible code of the bluff ends. Review Exhibit F. the <br />denntuon tn the uxie defies '':„u;nhe"st^.e regula.ton and nun,mire <br />the top at another. The ^ dial our City aeems to have <br />impact on steeper elevation of bluft are . . ., snecific code section because we <br />more questions and problems with t e ^ler municipalities have not begun to <br />have chosen more resiiiciive standards. I may ^ tot otor m p ^ <br />deal with the requirements ol implementing this section, we win coni, <br />t DNR whenever variances to the current code section are required. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />Review Eahibiis R and F2. <br />^mllg'e:ve"J^""h'vher elevations bu, more gentle sloped ponion of this <br />property? <br />D ... P.hihi, I the lower elevations of the original lo, have more gentler topographies^ <br />Review L.xhi . .nnlicant that lot line rearraimemcnl be readjusted so that a <br />Should we recommend to ^ ,,^pcd p„nions of the property <br />building envelope IS I .-es, ^sre id of Ihc north? This <br />:llTrefTrwhole‘’Uose and in.em of Mr. Lemmennan-s comprehensive <br />application? <br />1.