My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-18-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
01-18-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 1:52:55 PM
Creation date
10/5/2023 1:49:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />Zoning File #1894 <br />January 10, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />some time in October 1993. The applicant was advised of the need to apply for a conditional <br />use permit. The City is also asked to approved a substandard setback of 25’. Tlie code would <br />require an 85’ setback as tower plus three attached antennas total 85’ in height, review Exhibit <br />G. <br />Applicant has submitted a copy of his amateur radio license confirming that use is solely <br />for private or hobby use and not for commercial. Applicant resides in residence on property as <br />required by ordinance. The use is subordinate to or accessoiy to the principal residential use. <br />The property is owned by Whitney MacMillan. Please note Mr. MacMillan has signed <br />the application. <br />The rights of the amateur radio operator are well defined under the regulations of the <br />Federal Communications Commission. The courts allow local eovemmental units to create <br />W- <br />reasonable and safe guidelines for the installations of these strucmres but in no way can a <br />governmental unit deny the individual the right to install an antenna structure if all pertinent <br />standards of the regulations have been satisfied. <br />Review Exhibits E and F, the survey submitted by applicant is not current. If applicant <br />proceeds with application, he must provide an updated survey retlecting new north and west <br />boundaries. <br />Review Exhibit D, the property to the immediate east is owned by David MacMillan <br />(structure is 25’ from east lot line). Other contiguous properties are not owned by Mr. <br />MacMillan. The City cannot approve the 25’ setback based on the required setback set forth <br />in the zoning code. This is not a question of a visual or aesthetic burden upon adjacent property <br />owners but a matter of protection of private property. The setback is established so that if the <br />structure was to collapse it would create no impact on an adjacent property as structure would <br />fall within the defined boundaries of the property. If the City is to approve a conditional use <br />pennit for applicant, the structure must be relocated so to meet the 85’ setback from all lot lines <br />of the property. A subdivision of a lot line rearrangement between the David MacMillan and <br />Whitney MacMillan properties may be a consideration. <br />Applicant should be asked to determine how he wishes to proceed. Applicant’s options <br />are as follows: <br />1.Table application to provide applicant time to submit an updated and amended <br />survey relocating struemre within 2 acre rural property; or <br />Table application so that a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement can be filed <br />providing the additional area so that antenna structure conforms to the setback <br />standards of the ordinance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.