Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Zoning File #1901 <br />Januan.’ 14. 1994 <br />Page 7 of 9 <br />Septic <br />Wecknian notes all 25 lots have heen found to have suitable area for primarv and <br />alternate drainfield sites suitable for 5-bedroom home. Lots 2 and " Block 2 have been granted <br />a variance for an 8^ slope for the alternate drainfield site. A condit ^n of subdivision approval <br />must include request that an old well pit be propeny sealed on Lot 2. Block 2. In response to <br />the Park Commission and Engineer ’s request for the installation of the bike trail along Old <br />Crystal Bay Road. Weekman recommends that primary drainfield sites for Lots 2 and 3. BkKk <br />1 be moved 5’ east in order to allow .jdequate separation fn'm trail. <br />Roads <br />Review preliminary plans. Countryside Drive shall be extended to Old Cry stal Bay Road <br />per the directives of the resolution. Once completed, the City will assume the maintenance of <br />road when older portions have been reviewed and upgraded if necessary. Directives ol the <br />resolution granting approval of Countryside Manor were repeated again in the tmdings and <br />conditions of the resolution that granted approval of Countryside Second Addition. The <br />developed properties within Countryside subdivision have been served by the public road but <br />maintained by the private propeny owners. Developer has advised that the neighbors who <br />attended information meeting held January* 12 voiced major concern with the fact that this road <br />would be a through road. They plan to petition the City to allow cul-de-sac to remain w ith a <br />cul-de-sac to the west and a future connection corridor platted as an oullot. It was always the <br />full intent of the City to create a public road connecting Willow and Old Crystal Bay Road. The <br />City Engineer asks if Manor Circle should be extended northward connecting with second phase <br />cul-de-sac road to north. He also asks if there should be a north/south connection linking one <br />of the plat roads to Watertown Road. The Engineer notes that continuation of these streets is <br />necessarv for convenient movement of traffic, effectiveness of fire proieciiuii. piuiiipl access foi <br />0 <br />emergency vehicles and efficient provision ot City services such as snow removal. <br />As for the Coffin property, two cul-de-sac roads are shown at approximately 1300’ in <br />length serving 9 lots each. The Engineer appears to concur that the location of the numerous <br />wetlands on the property poses a problem locating a logical connection tor the street. These <br />roadways would not meet the standards tor a public road. Review applicant s addendum. <br />Exhibit B. He notes the following reasons why a loop road would have a major impact on this <br />property: <br />1.Narrow land corridor between we.st property line and location of designated <br />wetland. <br />Roads would be located to the rear of Cygnet Place lots that are already limited <br />in depth.