My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
02-22-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 1:51:34 PM
Creation date
10/5/2023 1:48:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1901 <br />January 14. 1994 <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />the southeast comer of the Coffin property w here the reientioa^lreatment pond is located nght <br />at the edee of the wetland. Engineer notes that this would be a logical location tor the pond <br />which will function to protect the wetland from sediment deposition and would appear to satist\ <br />some of the necessary findings for granting variances to encroachment ot a wetland as tollows. <br />1. Would proposal be consistent with the objectives of encouraging land uses <br />compatible with the preservation of the natural landforms. vegetation and t e <br />marshes and wetlands? <br />Would proposal include development of land and water areas essential to continue <br />the temporarv withholding of rapid runoff of surface water which would create <br />downstream 'tlooding or pollution? The Planning Commission should make a <br />rcconimcndation concerning this encroachment. <br />Review Exhibit J. The City Engineer's preliminarv- report asks that all mitiption areas <br />also be designated with drainage easements. This would not be consistent with Council s <br />directive. Surveyor should be asked if this will have an impact on drv’ buildable ot each k <br />Parks. Trails, Park Dedication <br />Please review the Park Commission minutes of Thursday, Januarv' 6, 1994, E.xhibit H. <br />The Park Commission reviewed the most recent plan for the first stage ot development of the <br />mComn^ny. Th. developer advised they have been unable .0 fmd any conclus.ve <br />evidence or supportive dtKumentation that would identify the property as having historica <br />significance Mn^DOT has hired a consultant who is working closely with the Indian Council <br />lo'detemiine if the site has some sienificance requiring preservation but the process will take a <br />few “and may not be resolved un.tl May of 1994. If i. is found tha. .here ,s no htstorteal <br />significance, the property will be developed as a single family lot. <br />The park ouilot is located wiihin the first phase development and may have io Jbe <br />d^oi s^:S aL aVared » <br />ila, rt ChvTnlv allows credi. for the iratls adjacent to road right-ot-ways that share .he 10 <br />drainage and utility easements that run along the sides ot public roads. <br />Bod. Park Commission and Engineer ask that <br />Old Crystal Bay Road -><.-“11 as pan of the^^^^^^ <br />?.;larS^'TmU.“Se':™ -ils W..1 be public or private will have <br />an impact on the area a^d if dial would <br />from Park Commission concerning the cost to tne ue.eiopci <br />have any impact on park dedication tee.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.