My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
11-20-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 10:44:03 AM
Creation date
10/5/2023 8:44:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING ( OMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 20, loqs <br />(#3 - ^2002 I>ennis Plalteter - Continued) <br />Peterson commented that the Planning Commission was split in their opinion of the <br />subdivision Based on the preliminar>' subdivision meeting, Peterson noted that the <br />applicant has addressed some of the issues He did not w ish any changes to be made until <br />the accessory structure w as remov ed <br />Hawn received confirmation from Mabusth that there was adequate lot si/e in which to <br />build <br />There were no public comments <br />Smith commented on the letter from the DNR regarding future views of structures from <br />the lake. Mabusth said the letter outlined standard practices and requirements of DNR. <br />Steve Schroll of 2000 Sugar Woods asked if a joint road would be used for the two lots <br />via access to the back .nan of the subdiv ision Mabusth said a shared driveway would be <br />used but there were no requirements to upgrade The driveway must be at least 1C from <br />the south lot line of r>utlot Schroll was informed that there was no standard or <br />requirement of driveway improv ement. <br />Connie Gray, 819 Brown Road, asked where the two new homes would be built. <br />Mabusth show ed on a map the lot outlines and of building envelopes. The City does not <br />stipulate where a house should be located, other than meeting required setbacks of code <br />Mabusth noted that the home on east lot would be at least 30’ from the side lot line with <br />the Gray property. <br />Peterson commented that the location of the septic systems usually drives where most <br />homes are situated on the lot. <br />Scholl asked and was shown on the map where the septic system for these homes would <br />be placed and the likely home locations. <br />Lindquist moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2092 with a 1 <br />year deadline from ihe date of final approval of plat for remov al of the accessory structure <br />on east lot along with Staff recommendations 1-4. Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />'i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.