Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2059 <br />September 15, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />K - MCWD Memo - Finding that No EIS is Required <br />L - Orono Staff Response to EAW 7/18/95 <br />MCWD Response to Orono EAW Staff Response 8/7/95 <br />/23city Engineer ’s Comments 9/13/95 <br />o . October ’93 <br />• T T TP Feasibility Study October 93 ^ <br />• T T TP Feasibility Report September ’94 <br />• LUP Design Report May ’95 ,cAu;^ ms <br />. LUP Environment Assessment Workshwt ^W) May 95 <br />. -Phosphorus Removal by Urban Runoff Derention Basms (W.lham W. <br />Walker) <br />SUe/Wetland Status <br />f aW and the southeastern quadrant of the City of Medma. <br />The site of the proposed pond is a LoiK^by'te ”aS^OroTO^patt of its <br />Inventory, but is not one of ^bas^ T^fore administration of the WeUand Conservation <br />permit. <br />Shoreland Ordinance Permit Review Guidelines <br />c • in <;ubd 16 (J) (Topographic alterations/grading and filling), item 5, requires a Section 10 56. SuM^ 6 (J) (lop^^P^^ ^ of <br />number of consideration ,„h filling oeraiits, conditional use permits, variances andnumber of con6^on.l use permUs. variances and <br />Ihose Wlin« are included as Exhibit P at the end of tins packer. <br />• •• <br />X- u nrniect on the Wetland in regards to the six items of Subdivision <br />^^(Tsz) are addressed in Exhibit K, the MCWD memorandum and resoluuon <br />10.56, Subd. 16 (J-5a), are adares statement is required. Further, the proposed plans and <br />SLtoK°ge'«SrMicate that the MCWD wiU be adhering to the standards of Section <br />10.56, Subd. 16 (J-5d-k). <br />I <br />1