Laserfiche WebLink
< ^ rf 5Tirl ^Ttcndccl <br />inrn the lake 10 mainum a greater window of operationUliu UlC lOXVW tvy <br />Gaffron commented that both new plans do h°' show 1% ^ide ^ving lane <br />S»£SS%3SS “HSi <br />area is needed so that from a hardcover „oted that in their recent <br />generally does not use baclom P^^lssn, “ su^oLed they not use the back-in trailer parking <br />discussions with Hennepin Coun,, <br />concept. <br />Gaffron noted that the west <br />proposed as discussed previously, an . .. when car-trailers are not stacked <br />of traffic coming around the comer ^ extended as far east on No^ Shore <br />turn lane. Killien noted the County , Countv Road 135 by-pass lane for south <br />Drive as possible, my also ^ 51 east bound by-pass lane is pamally m place <br />bound trailers stacked on 135. The County no <br />but may need to be upgraded.but may need to dc upgiauwv*. <br />Killien noted that the County <br />north as possible. Their imtial setback and cause circulation p. ._____ u..e thar would force a lesser lake seioacR <xn _____ <br />be located as far <br />“ras“p^ibr «iai rseXull^oS" <br />TOter^i *e SJttom'entrance ^ toe <br />curve, and Peterson noted his ^ noted they had indicated to the County <br />ronldng a right hand rum any oo^ems and the entrance locations are cnttcal <br />dot that they are ''Tto “ b“‘“” but not all of the people they talked to at <br />to the circulation plan. Mhen 1 preferring a single entrance/exist <br />dot that they are trymg .o va».-- - - p^pie mey tautco - <br />Se^e;"; w« opposed to the rwo enhance concept, prefeming a single entrance/exis <br />point. <br />r-nr/frailer combinations could be stacked in the right mm lane <br />Goetten questioned how 'if was slighdy more ±an 200’, and P««to “"rf <br />before the entrance. ^uers. Rowlene noted that only on tare occasions has she <br />this would accommt^K ^ „a<l get into the North Arm access parking <br />come across car-traUers wail <br />lot.