Laserfiche WebLink
MINXTHS OF THE ORONO PL.-\NNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JLXY 17. 1995 <br />(#9 - #2040 Doug Olson • Continued) <br />Mabusth noted that the peninsula shape of the lot places major poftions of property ^^ithin <br />the 0-75'zone <br />Lindquist said any consideration by the appUcant to remove the stepping stones to the <br />dock ^ould be appreciated <br />Smith moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2040 for the remosal and <br />replacement of die concrete pad around the pool with the removal ot 65 s t. ot s^^nes an <br />170 s f of patio concrete to be replaced with grass Ayes 3, Nays I, Rowlene i ay^ <br />Rowlette's recommendation is for ail the stepping stones to be removed. Smith sai e <br />will make that recommendanon to the Olson’s and amend the appUcation if approval is <br />given <br />(#10) #2041 PHIL AND DARCY OTTO. 4116 HIGHWOOD ROAD * AFTER- <br />THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING 9:16-9:43 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit ot Publication were noted. <br />Mr. & Mrs. Ono were present. <br />Mabusth reported that grading plans had been approved with the building peniut. <br />Through the process in working within the steep banks in front of residence, additional <br />cuts were made which will require additional and higher retaining walls. The area was <br />excavated fiirthcr than originaJIy proposed when the structure was erected and weU <br />installed. The Engineer has reviewed the specifications for retaining walls and accepted <br />them Drainage tiles to rear of wail were noted and drained to the rear of the property. A <br />second curb cut was created with an island for safety reasons. Gerhardson approved the <br />curb cut. <br />Smith asked if the direction of the waU was changed and taken by the initiative of the <br />applicant Otto said he had thouaht the well people had contarted the City. Mabusth said <br />the City has no authority to issue permits for weUs. This was the responsibility of the <br />applicant. Rowlette noted that the appUcant had commented to her when she visited the <br />property that the house was not placed in the envelope as originally specified. The house <br />placement was skewered by the guidelines of the setback. The original placement mad? <br />the entry into the garage diflScult and the exit impossible. <br />Lindquist commented that the two curb cuts seemed to make sense.