10-16-1995 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning Fite #2065 September 14, 1995 Page 3 Regarding the 50’ utility easement, that portion within oiiguial Lot 3 (Toles) was vacated in 1979 except for the southeast 10’ of it. At that time the City coiKluded there was no real need for that easement, and accommodated the previous owner's wishes to allow construction of a pool in the area of that easement. The portion of easement tabling west from the cul-dc- sac b still in existence. There is probably no good reason to ^in this easement within Marfiekl ’s property, except for the northwesterly 10’ along the lot line. Suff is unaware of any exbtii^ utilities within this easemeitt. Additionally, in 1979 when the City vacated the 50’ easement portion, it required the then property owner, Whalen, to grant a drainage easement for the catch basin and outlM pipe within Lot 3, leading away from the cul-de-sac. City files contain a survey and description for that casement, but suff is unaware whether it was ever filed. Applicants propose grading that would eliminate the need for the storm drain. In the early 1980’s when the City constructed municipal sewer from the center of the Scotch Pmc 1 jne cul-de-sac westward to Old Crystal Bay Road, a portion of that constructed under Scotch Pine Lane and part of it within the Marficld property . Staff antici(utes finding that this sewer easement was grained by Marficld, however, any vacation of Sc^h Pine lang right-of-way would have to be conditioned on reuining an easement for the exbting sewer lines below it. The City Engineer notes this should be a 30’ wide casement. To Summarize, if the proposed vacation of Scotch Pine Lane and its associated Dicon Addition easements occurs, the City should reuin or obuin the following easements (assuming the replat also occurs): 1.A 30’ wide sewer easemeitt centered along the center line of the exbting sewer in Scotch Pine Lane. 2.The City should reuin some easement for access for sewer maintenance along the driveway that replaces Scotch Pine Lane. 3.Sundard perimeter drainage and utility easements, being 10’ in width along the northwest and southeast lines of the plat extending from the County road to the lake; a 10’ drainage and utility easement along County Road 51 within the replatted lots; and drainage and utility easements 5’ in width either side of the new byjndaries between the lots, extending from the County road to lake. 4.Utiliiy easements should also be granted for any utility lines which may already be in place, including gas, electric, cable, phone, etc. L_______>^^at «I ii fT unn^ttlTn ■