My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-16-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
10-16-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2023 2:42:56 PM
Creation date
10/4/2023 2:29:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
470
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2065 <br />Septembe r 14. 1995 <br />Page: <br />Scotch Pine Lane was platted as a public road and the City has mainuuned it as such ever <br />since. Such a road in Orono’s rural zone today would be planed as a private road outlot. <br />Proposed Vacation/Replat <br />After many years in which onlv tw o of the three property owners in the Dkon Addition <br />could agree, the new owner of 2435 &otch Pine, William Toles, has petitioned along with the <br />Marfields and the Hills, to vacate Scotch Pine Lane. Their intent is to use a shared driveway <br />over the vacated roadway for 2425 (Hill) and 2455 (Marfield). Mr. Toles at 2435 is proposmg <br />a separate driveway access directly onto County Road 51, abandoning his use of Scotch Puk <br />Lane altogether. <br />Further, the property owners have agreed on a proposal to split up the vacated Scokh <br />Pine Lane, which they have to do through a replat since their proposed boundanes do n^ follow <br />the normal center line at which the County would automatically split out the ownership. <br />Referring to Exhibit E. note that the Hill property includes Lot 4 with their house plus <br />Lot 2 which is the platted corridor giving them private lake access. They currently cross the <br />Scotch Pine I cul-de-sac in order to get to their lakeshore. <br />Under the proposed vacation and replat, (see Exhibits F and H) Marfield will gain the <br />west and southwest portions of Scotch Pine Lane; Hill will pick up the portion of Scotch Pine <br />adjacent to their house, as well as much of the cul-de-sac, giving them a continuous single parcel <br />from the County road to the lake; and Toles on Lot 3 wUl pick up the end <br />A short (20’x90*) outlot is proposed for the shared portion of the proposed Marflcla/nUi <br />driveway. Haniiing Commission b asked to consider whether the to « i^ <br />"back tot" which won’t meet the 150% acreage or setback standards. The Marfield tot <br />would appea** to become a "back lot" under this proposal. <br />The property owners intend to remove most of the blacktop, do minor filling as necessary <br />to essentially re-esublish the natural grade, and turn the area back into grass. They arc wiMing <br />to grant to the City and the public all necessary drainage and utility easements, and have <br />received preliminary verbal approval from Hennepin County Public Works for the addiuonal <br />access location onto County Road 51. <br />Easement Vacation <br />Referring to Exhibit G, note that a significant number of easements were originally <br />granted as part of the 1974 plat. These include utility easements along ^ ^t west <br />boundaries; a 50’ utUity easement tuiining from the east boundary to the west bound^, ^ t^ <br />road easement itself, as well as dedication for 50’ of County Road 51. The plat also <br />a wetland to the southeast, but staff is unaware of an easement dedicated for that wetland, and <br />no easement is dedicated in the plat language.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.