My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-16-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
10-16-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2023 2:42:56 PM
Creation date
10/4/2023 2:29:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
470
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
\flNXTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 10 1 ».. <br />(«) #2065 SAMUEL MARFEEXD. 2455 SCOTCH <br />aq wn i Qr^nxm PrVE LANE^ AND WILLIAM TOLES^ 24J5 <br />vSoTSf ^otch pine <br />DRAINAGE AND UTILm EASEMENTS - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />(REPLAT) 8:00-8:37 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and .Afildavit of Publication were noted. <br />The applicants. Mr. & Mrs. Marfield, Mr. & Mrs. Hill, and William Toles, were present. <br />Gaffron reported that the request is for a vacation of a road <br />vacation with a rededication of utilitv- easement and replat <br />propertv was planed to create j ouuoaoic lois emu - k «------- ••• ■ - <br />^ ^j 1 The reolst would a U ow the Hill property <br />necessary to accommodate existing and future utility needs. <br />Gafiron noted that a leaer irom NSP indicates there is a distnounon facility <br />N^wiU not give their approval for the easement vacanon and any changes will have to <br />be made at thfeipense of the applicants. Gaffron t -ught if the existing ut^^lmM were <br />located that NSP would possibly approve the easement vaemon in «change for <br />easements A Minnegasco lener said there are natural gaa lines in “f ’*■ <br />company objects to the proposal unless suitable right of way and redediMUon iwwived. <br />Peterson clarified that the utility easements must remain as they now exist. Gaft <br />confirmed this. <br />OshfR-nn said Citv scwcr was extended to the area in 1980 with 10* easement on cither side <br />of the line Hie Citv Encineer indicates 30* total width is needed for that utility casement. <br />U applicants have not pro.d^ a surv ty of where all the utility hnes are <br />located. This is required and is being asked tor from the appbeants. <br />>m flt.*--i'*-rV'■.a.i k'.am ..an.mm .
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.