10-16-1995 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNlNG^Ca^llSSION MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 (;?14 • ?2056 Michael &. Barbara Wigiey - Continued) Hawn said if the boulder r^aUs were wanted to hold ^ should be able to provide plants that gennmate quickls Silt - option to prevent erosion into the lake wnile vegetation was germinating. Peterson moved, Schroeder seconded, to table Application =:056 for redesigning and eainina of a MCWD permit Ayes o. Nays 0. Lindquist said the wails would more than likely be denied b> the lake and n ' ' coing ahead with this proposal Schroeder said if erosion w as clearly show^t, then he would be wiling to look at the proposal Smith said she did not see the project to include boulder walls The applicant responded that her major concern for the project w« the safety of her children (#15) #2057 JAMES NYSTROM. 1745 CONCORDIA STREET - VARIANCES PUBLIC hearing IO:5»-li:22 P.M. The Ceniicate of Mailing and .Affidavit of Publicatton were noted. Mi. Nystrom and his architea, Greg Frazee, were present. Gaffi-on repotted that me located within residential tear down 7'M^e w^ 10’ wide deck encroaching the 0-75' the 0-75’ zone and is ‘ jown and reconstniaed to meet the setback zone. The 0.7;. ^o„e would be significantly reduced with increases requiremems. H^dco e ^ zone. The side s«back ts ;ZrsS m 9 i' wher^W fs required. The average lakeshore setback ,s also an issue to the house on the north. I H if rhp. deck and house could be moved back 10', resulting in no hardcover Lindquist asked if the done but preferred the proposed scenario. m the 0-75 zone. ^ j^e 75’ setback with a porch touching the side lot line. The house to the sous. • ^ applicant to maintain the back lO’, the view of the lake would be limited. Lindquist said he had a problem with any structure in the 0-75’. 21