My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-18-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
09-18-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2023 2:43:28 PM
Creation date
9/28/2023 4:30:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
647
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2065 <br />September 14, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />Scotch Pine Lane was platted as a public road and the City has maintained it as such ever <br />since. Such a road in Orono ’s rural zone today would be platted as a private road outlot. <br />Proposed Vacation/Replat <br />After many years in which only two of the three propeny owners in the Dicon Addition <br />could agree, the new owner of 2435 Scotch Pine, William Toles, has petitioned along with the <br />Marfields and the Hills, to vacate Scotch Pine Lane. Their intent is to use a shared driveway <br />over the vacated roadway for 2425 (Hill) and 2455 (Marfield). Mr. Toles at 2435 is proposmg <br />a separate driveway access directly onto County Road 51, abandoning his use of Scotch Pine <br />Lane altogether. <br />Further, the property owners have agreed on a proposal to split up the vacated Scotch <br />Pine Lane, which they have to do thro- gh a replat since their proposed boundaries do not follow <br />the normal center line at which the County would automatically split out the ownership. <br />Referring to Exhibit E, note that the Hill property includes Lot 4 with their house plus <br />Lot 2 which is the platted corridor giving them private lake access. They currently cross the <br />Scotch Pine Lane cul-de-sac in order to get to their lakeshore. <br />Under the proposed vacation and replat, (see Exhibits F and H) Marfield will gain the <br />west and southwest portions of Scotch Pine Une; Hill will pick up the portion of Scotch Pine <br />adjacent to their house, as well as much of the cul-de-sac. giving them a continuous smgle parcel <br />from the County road to the lake; and Toles on Lot 3 will pick up the end of the cul-de-sac. <br />A short (20’x90’) outlot is proposed for the shared portion of the proposed Ma^ield/Hill <br />driveway. Planning Commission is asked to consider whether the replat results in a new <br />"back lot” which won ’t meet the 150% acreage or setback standards. The Marfield lot <br />would appear to become a "back lot" under this proposal. <br />The property owners intend to remove most of the blacktop, do minor filling as necessary <br />to essentially re-establish the natural grade, and mm the area back into grass. They are willing <br />to grant to the Citv and the public all necessary drainage and utility easements, and have <br />received preliminary^ verbal approval from Hennepin County Public Works for the additional <br />access location onto County Road 51. <br />Easement Vacation <br />Referring to Exhibit G, note that a significant number of easements were originally <br />granted as part of the 1974 plat. These include utility easements along the east and west <br />boundaries; a 50’ utility easement running from the east boundary to the west boundary, and the <br />road easement itself, as well as dedication for 50’ of County Road 51. The plat also showed <br />a wetland to the southeast, but staff is unaware of an easement dedicated for that wetland, and <br />no easement is dedicated in the plat language.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.