Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2059 <br />September 15, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />K - MCWD Memo - Finding *Jiat No EIS is Required <br />L - Orono Staff Response to EAW 7/18/95 <br />M - MCWD Response to Orono EAW Staff Response 8/7/95 <br />N - City Engineer ’s Comments 9/13/95 <br />O - Submitted Documents Referenced but not Attached: <br />• Long Lake Improvement Project (LLIP) Diagnostic Study October ’93 <br />• LLIP Feasibility Study October ’93 <br />• LLIP Feasibility Report September ’94 <br />• LLIP Design Report May ’95 <br />• LLIP Environment Assessment Worksheet (EAW) May ’95 <br />• "Phosphorus Removal by Urban Runoff Detention Basins" (William W. <br />Walker) <br />Site/Wetiand Status <br />The proposed site of the wet detention pond is on the William Pierce property, on the south side <br />of County Road 6 approximately halfway between Long Lake Boulevard and Tanglewood Road. <br />The ponds will be centered over the existing creek which flows to Long Lake from Wolsfeld <br />Lake and the southeastern quadrant of the City of Medina. <br />The site of the proposed pond is a Type 2/Type 7 wetland shown on the National Wetlands <br />Inventor}', but is not one of the basins historically protected by the City of Orono as part of its <br />1975 wetland inventory (sec Exhibits E). Therefore, administration of the Wetland Conservation <br />Act regulations on filling of this wetland is the responsibility of Orono ’s designated LGU, the <br />Watershed District. However, as noted above, a number of City ordinances are also involv^, <br />and the City still requires the conditional use permit, variance approvals, and land alteration <br />permit. <br />Shoreland Ordinance Permit Review Guidelines <br />Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (J) (Topographic alterations/grading and filling), item 5, requires a <br />number of considerations and conditions that must be adhered to during the issuance of <br />construction permits, grading and filling permits, conditional use permits, variances and <br />subdivision approval. Those guidelines are included as Exhibit P at the end of this packet. <br />The effect of the proposed project on the wetland in regards to the six items of Subdivision <br />10.56, Subd. 16 (J-5a), are addressed in Exhibit K, the MCWD memorandum and resolution <br />finding that no environmental impact statement is required. Further, the proposed plans and <br />specifications generally indicate that the MCWD will be adhering to the standards of Section <br />10.56, Subd. 16 (J-5d-k).