Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2044 <br />September 11, 1995 <br />Page 3 <br />The only additional hardcover which could be removed to decrease the 75-250’ percentage is in <br />the existing driveway, which varies from 16 ’ to 25 in width. Narrowing this may reduce guest <br />parking ability. The 195 s.f. utility shed is a possible strucmral hardcover removal, but would <br />eliminate needed storage space. <br />Issues for Consideratioii <br />1. <br />•y <br />Are the proposed removals of virtually all landscape bed hardcover sufficient, or should <br />additional items of hardcover be reduced.^ <br />Does Planning Commission concur with staff that an after-the-fact building permit and <br />construction inspection should be re()uired for the above-deck screen porch constructed <br />without permits? <br />3. Does Planning Commis sion have any other concerns about this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Any recommendation for approval should identify the hardships and justification for the <br />hardcover variance approval; should specify removals required in order to approve the current <br />request; and should address the issue of the screen porch construction. <br />Options for Action <br />1. Approve as proposed. <br />2. Approve with further reductions. <br />3. Table for further information. <br />4. <br />5. <br />Deny. <br />Other.