Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Memo #2 <br />March 16, 1995 <br />Page 5 <br />Any recommeiKlaiion of approval must include the following conditions: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />If access drive to combined Lots 3 and 4 at Frederick Street remains as is. <br />applicant shall create easement over portion of driveway that intersects Lot 1 in <br />favor of combined Lots 3 and 4. <br />Applicant depending upon the resolve of location of existing services to the <br />existing residence, applicant shall either agree to reconnect for new sewer and <br />water service to the existing residertce or create utility easements over Lot 1. The <br />City would encourage the applicant to consider reconnecting so as not to further <br />encumber Lot 1 with easements. <br />Applicant to grant an easement over the municipal sewer line in the northeast <br />comer of combined Lots 3 and 4. <br />Resolve of access to Lot 1 either to approve the existing curb cut at Casco Point <br />Road or to require connection to 20 ’ wide driveway outlot. <br />Upon application for building permit, future owner shall make payment for a <br />sewer connection charge based on the 1995 fee schedule of $1.284.50 plus a SAC <br />charge of $850. A water unit has already been paid against the property. <br />The subdivision is subject to a park dedication fee based on 8% of the fair market <br />value of the property. <br />Staff would ask the applicant what his intentions are concerning resolve of the various questions <br />surrounding the boathouse stnicmre in the lakeshore yard. Applicant’s contractor had completed <br />an expansion of an upper level without the benefit of building permits in the 1970s. During an <br />after-the-fact review of the violations, the applicant was directed to remove the upper level and <br />to top the boathouse with an upper level deck. The matter still remains unresolved.