04-17-1995 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #2006 April 13, 1995 Page 2 The applicant's addendum notes the existing guest house on Lot 2 shall remain as either a ^est house or be part of the future principal structure. Applicant must be placed on notice that if the existing residence on Lot 2 is to serve as a future guest house that applicant at this time should reserve additional 2 acres in area. Proposed Lot 2 at 2 acres cannot meet area needs for a separate guest house unit. The structure can be converted to an accessory structure as long as the kitchen area is removed and the City is satisfied that this structure could not serve as an independent residential unit. Applicant should be asked to comment on this matter. In light of our upcoming workshop to consider the issue of current driveway and road standards staff will not comment on an internal road. Based on the conceptual direction of the Council at their April 10th meeting, individual driveways could provide legal access for three residential units. In the case of applicant’s property, there is adequate width for the two residential units to be ser% ed at Oxford Road, a private road, and if applicant achieves a lot line rearrangement with the property to the north, mere is also adequate lot width at Leaf Street. The property is currently 199.98’. If the lot line rearrangement is not completed as shown, existing width may not be a problem. The access improvements to this site are developed via a formal drive at Leaf Street. The applicant has discussed relocating the drainageway within Lot 1 in order to open up the building envelope. This proposed improvement would require a separate conditional use permit review and should be included with the filing of the subdivision along with grading plans for the improvement. Review Exhibit D, two stubs are available to this property. Applicant will make a new connection to serve one of the three lots. Applicant must provide detailed plans for the connection to the municipal sewer to serve Lot 3. There is a shed on the south side of Lot 3 that has not been located on plan. Once the property is subdivided, the shed can no longer claim credit for the residence struemre on Lot 2. “nie shed would now become nonconforming. The City normally requires the removal of the sh^ within a year from the final plat approval date if a building permit has not been issued by the deadline. Applicant has advised that the mmaround and the roadway leading to the west encrMchi^ within Lots 1 and 2 will be removed. The property is located within the LR-IA Zoning Distnct and subject to hardcover controls. The property will be subject to review by the Park Commission to determine the need for additional land for trail or park use. If land is not taken, a cash payment is accepted in liei^ the dedication of land currently at the rate of 8% of the fair market value of the undeveloped property.