Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CONLNUSSION <br />NfEETING HELD ON ALARCH 20, 1995 <br />(#7 - #2002 William Smith - Continued) <br />access comes from <br />Another option discussed was a new driveway from Fox Street, either with a new curb cut <br />or the use of the existing curb cut with an immediate turn to the west. Matoh said she <br />would check with Gerhardson regarding a new curb cut; but at this time, she was not <br />certain that this option would meet Council s approval <br />allow it at this time. Mabusth responded that we have discussed what the c(^e squires <br />and have not examined the statement of hardships prepared by applicant seekmg vanances <br />to code requirements. <br />Rowlette said she was interested in using the other curb cut oft'of Fox Street, and docs <br />only be done if code ccMild be met. <br />Lindquist felt that a separate curb cut and separate driveway were the only altenutives. <br />and approved access via a driveway <br />Schroeder responded that an aesthetic argument is not a good reason tor a variance and <br />saw Fox Run as the best alternative His second choice was use of the onginal dnveway. <br />and third best, another private road, Schroeder said the applicant need^ to e^l ah <br />avenues with obtaining the use of Fox Run as an access If tins ts not “ <br />and Rowlerie said it was their opinion that this was not a subdivision. Mabusth concureo <br />that the u3C of the e.xisting driveway, the new road off the existing road, or the new curt <br />cut were not viable options unless the commission were willing to approve the necessary <br />variances. The code calls for a private road to serve three lots.