05-15-1995 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #2017 May 10. 1995 Page 3 Refer to Exhibit G. the Engineer finds the proposal to be feasible and the new curb cut at Eagerness Point Road that has been approved. Gustafson asks for specific detail with the grading and drainage plans to be submitted with the new construction plan as follows: 1.Applicant to show how drainage from Webb Street is to be directed away from the property and along the road right-of-way - curbing, benning?? 2.Upon your inspection, review the topography/elevations along the west side lot line where new garage will be installed. If there is to be a cut in that area, a 2-3 ’ retaining wall will be required to the west side of the drive. If applicant is able to obuin western property owner ’s permission, grading can be more gradually sloped at west side lot line not requiring reuining wall. 3.Applicant’s grading plan to reflect existing elevations, garage floor elevations and driveway grade. Descriptioo of Unusual Finding or Hardships Review Exhibit A. Applicant notes the following: 1 The unusual triangular shape of the lot that is surrounded by roadway on two sides ard the topography place ^lecial restrictions on construction. 2. 3. The house was constructed prior to current setback standards Major hardcover decreases are proposed within the 75-250’ setback and a smicroral coverage decrease will also be realized. 4^ The new addition will result in improved side setbacks Issues for Consideranon 1. 2. Are the physical hardships valid? Is the proposal too ambitious for the site ... in consideration of the existing improvements? 3.In the LR-IC zoning district the side street setback is 15’, should the stnicture be moved 7’ to the northwest in order to meet the 30 ’ street setback at Eagerness Poiiu Road? What of the impact on the higher elevations? 4. Other issues raised by Planning Commission members, -----------.