My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
05-15-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:33:22 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:28:27 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2015 <br />May 4, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />DescriptioB of Request <br />The applicant proposes an approxu-naie 35'x44' addiuon at the noithwesi of the existing <br />existing structure was built in 1947 pnor to setback standards for residential construction and <br />prior to the 5 acre zoning standards adopted by the Citv’ in 1975. <br />In 1984 the City granted a street setback variance for the detached garage located to the <br />immediate southeast of the residence. <br />It is the intention of the applicant to construct the larger addition and eventually raise the older <br />portion of the structure a^d reconstruct the residence immediately adjacent to the <br />Either away from the street lot line. Review Exhibu it is difficult to place structure furth <br />north to meet the 100’ setback because of the severe sloping topography. <br />In order to provide positive drainage from the garage elevation and create I«smve ^gc to <br />the northwest of the new addition, it will be necessary to place approximately 3 1/2 of <br />beneath the garage. Based on the height definition, the vertical height will ^ determined at ^ <br />garaee level. 3 1/2’ of fill and the vaulted ceiling design impact the final determination of the <br />legaf height now shown at 32 1/2’, refer to Exhibit E-1. <br />AoDlicant has been asked to file a conditional use permit as the upper level of the three st^ <br />Addition will contain an apartment area for applicant’s mother-in-law. Review the ^ui^ <br />standards for such use. Review Exhibit F-2, note the upper level apartment is con^t^ from <br />a hallway that leads from the mud room and kitchen addition. A secondary gra^ level acwM <br />door extends through the garage that eventually coimecK ® ^ <br />Review Exhibit E-2. the rear elevation shows a lower level pauo door leadmg to the rear y^^ <br />S^fTrouid suggest the primary access to the apartment would be from the access door leadmg <br />from the mud room. <br />An existing septic system was installed in 1987 and was designed to serve a three bedrtwm <br />home Review Exhibits J-1 & 2, septic testing confirmed there is adequate area to sew a ft e <br />tedroom residence. The existing system will be upgraded to serve the additional two bedrooms <br />in the addition. <br />There is adequate parking on this 5+ acre site to serve parking needs for the additional guest <br />house unit.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.