Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1979 <br />November 15, 1994 <br />Paee 3 <br />A. <br />B <br />The deck although located completely in front of the average lakeshore setback <br />line had no visual impact upon the residences to either side of the subject <br />structure based on location of deck to the existing principal strucmre, topography <br />and maure plantings at south side lot line. <br />11.9 s.f. of hardcover had existed within the 0-75’ setback area and that resulted <br />from the slight encroachment of the lakeshore deck. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. <br />2. <br />Will Planning Commission approve new construction that involves an encroachment of <br />the 75’ lakeshore setback area--should deck be altered to meet the 75’ setback from the <br />lakeshore? <br />Excesses of hardcover exist within the 75-250’. Would you allow additional expansions <br />of new deck out of the lakeshore setback area? <br />3. Are further hardcover reductions necessary as a result of the proposed improvements? <br />If existing hardcover improvements are to be removed as a condition of variance approval, your <br />recommendation should specify removals must be completed prior to the footing inspection for <br />new deck structure plus any other conditions required by the Planning Commission. If the <br />Planning Commission will allow no encroachment of the 75’ setback, staff must ask that <br />applicant ’s surveyor state the exact location of 75’ setback line so that field inspector <br />confirm no encroachment on site. The City will also require an amended survey locating <br />approved deck location.