My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-20-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
03-20-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:30:43 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:26:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File <1^1979 <br />November 15, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Applicant ’s Addendum <br />C - Property Owners List <br />D - Plat Map <br />E - Hardcover Site Plan <br />F - 0-75’ Hardcover Facts Based on Replacement of Existing Deck <br />G - 75-250’ Hardcover Facts Based on Replacement of Existing Deck <br />H - 0-75’ If Expanded Deck Approved <br />I - 75-250’ If Expanded Deck Approved <br />J - Survey Locating Proposed Deck Improvements <br />K - Work Sheet for Expanded Deck Areas <br />L - Deck Plan <br />M - Original Survey <br />N - Approximate Location of Residences on Adjacent Lots <br />O - Staff Sketch - Setback of Existing Deck/Average Lakeshore Setback Line <br />Brief Review of Application <br />Applicant seeks approval of variances to the above referenced sections of the code to allow <br />either the replacemvmt of a former 14’x26’ lakeside deck or replacement of former deck with <br />expansions into the 0-75’ and 75-250’ setback areas. The entire deck structure was located in <br />front of the average lakeshore setback line. The deck structure was located approximately 71 ’ <br />from the shoreline. The proposed expanded deck would extend 65’ from the shoreline. <br />The applicant ’s addendum notes that the existing deck is rotting and in a serious state of <br />disrepair. Upon a recent site inspection, staff found that the entire deck has been removed. The <br />surveys of the property have never shown the subject deck (Exhibit M). It is difficult to confirm <br />the exact dimensions of the former deck but it would appear from the former firework and <br />location of a footing that the 14’x26’ deck was as drawn in proposed site plans (Exhibits J and <br />O). <br />The majority of hardcover improvements on this property are located in the 75-250’ setback <br />area. The principal structure except for the lakeside deck met all required setbacks. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Please refer to Exhibit A, the application and applicant ’s addendum. Exhibit B. Staff would add <br />the following:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.