Laserfiche WebLink
TO: <br />DA1E: <br />6. <br />Chair Schrocder and Orono Flanning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorsc, City Administrator <br />FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator <br />February 15, 1995 <br />SUBJECT: #1996 Gregg Perl. 309 Westlake Street - Variance - Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: LR>1A <br />Total area including PID 05-117-23 23 0021 and 0020 * 1.6 acres <br />Pertinent Ordinances <br />Section 10.03, Subd. 4 - Prohibition <br />It is unlawful to convert, enlarge, rcconsttuct or alter any structure or use any structure <br />or land for any purpose nor in any maruier which is not in conformity with the Zoning Chapter. <br />Section 10.23, Subd. 6(B) - Side yard setback variance <br />Required = 30’ <br />Existing = 12’ (3’ eave to south side of residence considered an encroachment when a <br />substandard setback exists) <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Plat <br />C - Property Owners List <br />D - Applicant’s Letter <br />E - Survey <br />F - Floor Plan Lower Level <br />G - Elevation - Rear - Approved with Application #1104 <br />H - Current Elevation <br />I - Resolution #2318 <br />J - Advance Surveying & Engineering Co. Letter 10/5/87 <br />K - Gaffron Letter of 12/8/87 Advising of Need for Building Permit <br />Description of Request <br />The applicant proceeded to install bedrooms in the upper level of the southwest comer of <br />residence necessitating the expansion of the roof envelope in order to meet the required lepl <br />height, refer to Exhibits G and H. The improvements were begun without the required building <br />permit. Staff issued a stop work order when the work was discovered in progress. Applicant <br />was advised of the need to file a side setback variance as portions of the residence were located <br />within the required 30’ sid^ setback.