Laserfiche WebLink
MIHUTBS OP THE PIAmillG CXMNISSIOH TING KBID JOIIB 15, 1987 <br />#1163 JOmi NCDONBLL <br />1255 NOODHILL AVBHUB <br />PRBLIillHART SUBDIVISIOH CLASS III <br />PUBLIC HEARING 7:52-8:35 <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />was noted. <br />Present for this matter were; John McDowell, Rick <br />Sathre, Gary Peterson, and Henry Kingman. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth first explained the <br />ownership and subdivision of Parcel B property by <br />Woodhill prior to the sale to John McDowell. She spoke <br />to the Woodhill attorneys who advised that sale has not <br />taken place and sale will not be finalized until Mr. <br />McDowell completes the subdivision. Therefore, staff <br />suggests that Woodhill join in the application with Mr. <br />McDowell. She noted that the southeast portion of <br />Parcel B could become either an out lot or a separate <br />lot. <br />Henry Kingman stated that they have no plans for the <br />southeast portion other than combining it with the <br />Woodhill Country Club property as an outlot. He noted <br />that Woodhill will join in the subdivision application. <br />John McDowell explained the proposed 5 lot plat served <br />by both a private road and an existing private easement <br />(serving property from the southern end) created in a <br />previous subdivision involving the entire J. Pillsbury <br />homestead . <br />Applicants Engineer/Surveyor Rick Sathre explained the <br />technical points of the proposed sites. He noted that <br />they propose the road at a minimum paved width of 20 <br />feet (24 feet required) in order to minimize the loss of <br />trees and major land alteration required with road <br />construction because of the difficult topography. He <br />noted that the sites are capable of supporting septic <br />systems. Lots 2 and 3 will have mound systems. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the City <br />Engineer recommends the road at a minimum paved width of <br />22* and an 80* diameter cul-de-sac in order to <br />accomodate emetgency vehicle access and snow removal. <br />City Engineer also recommends that the minimum width of <br />road between the retaining walls be 26*. Applicant is <br />also being requested to install a cul-de-sac at the end <br />of Woodhill Ave. and dedicate additional width to <br />provide a 50* right-of-way. She stated that Woodhill <br />Ave. is substandard noting that if it were upgraded the <br />cost would be assessed against the benefitting property <br />owners. <br />#1