Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PUOIMING COMMISSION , IH:TING NOVEMBER 21, 1988 <br />ZONING PILE il302-CITT OP ORONO CONTINUED <br />with that information. Once the residents have the guardrail <br />information, it would be their responsibility to contact the <br />City. Motion, Ayes*6, Nays=0, Motion passed. <br />#1337 ROBERT PAIGE <br />3493 CRYSTAL PLACE <br />VARIANCES <br />SECOND REVIEW <br />Mr. Paige was present for this second review. <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron provided <br />a brief history of this application. Mr. Paige had previously <br />received direction from the Planning Commission to revise the <br />location of the proposed garage. Mr. Paige was now planning on <br />replacing the existing garage structure with a larger garage and <br />would require a 5' side yard setback variance. Gaffron explained <br />that if the garage is moved back, as Mr. Paige agreed to do, then <br />there would not be a need for a variance to the 30* street <br />setback requirement for garage doors facing the street. <br />Planning Commission member Hanson asked how Mr. Paige would <br />access the proposed garage. Mr. Paige responded that he would <br />access off of Navarre Avenue. Planning Commission member asked <br />how'far from Navarre Avenue the new garage would be located. Mr. <br />Paige indicated that it would be 30*. <br />It was moved by Planning Commission member Brown, seconded <br />by Planning Commission member Brown, to recommend approval of <br />this application, provided that the garage be located at least <br />30* from the west lot line and 5* from the south lot line. Mr. <br />Paige inquired as to whether the 30* was from the foundation or <br />roof? Gaffron clarified that it would be from the foundation and <br />that the overhang could be a maximum of 1-1/2 feet. Motion, <br />Ayes«6, Nays-0, Motion passed. <br />#1346 EINAR HAGBERG <br />740 NORTH ARM DRIVE <br />VARIANCE <br />Mr. Hagberg was present for this matter. <br />As explained by Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator <br />Gatffron, this matter was referred back to the Planning Commission <br />from the City Council. The Council was concerned about the <br />discovery of a sewer line that would be located 5* from the <br />proposed storage garage. Public Works Director C»rhardson had <br />indicated that the line would just be used for flushing <br />downstream systems so the 5* setback would be sufficient. Mr. <br />Hagberg had provided a list of items that required storage. <br />Gaffron suggested that the lack of storage and the need for <br />storage might be construed as a hardship. Mr. Hagberg*s present <br />garage is located in such a way that adding to it would not be <br />practical due to the topography of his land.