Laserfiche WebLink
iinniTBS OP the piAimiEG comussiom !T1«6 OCTOBER 3, 1988 <br />H -I I10HIE6 PILE #1327-SOSKni COETIEI- ^ <br />developed# the draina9e outlet will be placed in the ditch coinin9 <br />into the north end of this lot* The ditch has a 9radual slope <br />and because of the layout, the storm drainage will be directed <br />away from the southern portion of the ravine* There will be no <br />need for the ditch beca’’^e any necessary drainage can take place <br />over land* That area could be then be filled in which would <br />provide the requirements for the building envelope on that Lot* <br />Chairman Kelley inquired as to the existence of flowage or <br />conservation easements in the area proposed to be filled* <br />Mabusth stated that there were none so the filling could be done <br />with site grading approval only* Planning Commission member <br />Johnson asked if the ditch would be filled in all the way to the <br />northeast corner of the lot? Mr* Krautkremer explained that it <br />would be filled in so that there would be enough area to build a <br />home in the back. Kelley expressed his concern over where the <br />flowage would go* Mr* Krautkremer indicated that drainage is <br />redirected to the road* Kelley asked if the road would then have <br />curbs* Mr* Krautkremer replied affirmatively* The City would <br />maintain the road* <br />Planning Commission member Johnson stated that in his <br />opinion there was only one buildable lot between Lots 1 t 2 <br />because of the ditch, unless the entire area was piped with storm <br />sewer* Mr* Krautkremer explained that once the curbs and gutters <br />were installed, there would be no need for the ditch and it would <br />be entirely filled in* Mabusth added that filling in the ditch <br />would provide a half-acre, contiguous, building envelope. <br />Kelley asked about the increase in drainage that would result <br />from redirecting the drainage* Mabusth stated those concerns <br />would be addressed at the October 17 Planning Commission meeting* <br />Ms* Pamela Wood and Terry Pate, 1131 Wildhursc Trail, asked <br />how the ravine bordering the Soskin property interacted with the <br />large ravine that runs down the north side of their property* <br />Ms. Wood stated that the portion of the ravine proposed to be <br />filled in connects with the ravine that runs through her <br />property* Mr* Krautkremer explained that the connecting portion <br />of the ravine wouldstill carry drainage through the ravine within <br />the Soskin property and eventually to Ms. Wood's portion of the <br />ravine * <br />Chairman Kelley interjected that this flowage question would <br />need to be addressed before the next Planning Commission meeting* <br />Ms* Wood also wanted to know the reason for the 140* frontage* <br />Kelley stated that was a good question* Assistant Planning and <br />Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that Orono's one acre zoning <br />started in the mid-50*s* The 140* standard probably goes back <br />25-30 years* The specific reasons for the 140* standard were not <br />known, but past councils obviously had been comfortable with it* <br />Ms. Wood also questioned the number of variances the City of