09-19-1988 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

faWrBS OF THB FUamiHG COMNISSIOH rtino SBPTBMBBR 19, 1988 • IZOSIIIG PILE #1321-HAISLBT COHTI1I1 City would agree to vacate the road. Planning Commission member Bellows observed that actually the developers to the east were being put on notice that the road may not be a through road. She told Ms. Taylor that it was their intent to do well by the School Districtr as well as the City overall. When development to the east begins, the City would take into consideration its agreement with the School District. Bellows suggested that a road proceeding east would best protect the School District. Planning Commission member Cohen asked why the City does not just reserve the right to the road, subject to the understanding that it remain reserved until such time as the School District satisfies the agreement to purchase the property. Zoning Administrator Mabusth reminded the Planning Commission that the right-of-way requirements is similar to that taken by the City in the Woodhaven, Peterson Addition and Second Addition plats. Ms. Taylor told Kelley that having a perpetual easement for a road on the property would make the property unusable to the School District. She would prefer to see the easement run for 11 years, after which a vacation would be granted should the Schrol District purchase the entire parcel. Attorney Leung reiterated his desiis to have an automatic vacation of the easement when the conveyance deed is filed. Cohen stated that the School Board was dealing with the City, they would have to come back to the City to vacate the road. Ms. Taylor asked if the proposed agreement would include the provision that the road would remain undeveloped? The Planning Commission members all concurred that the road would not be developed. Cohen stated that the City would reserve the right to develop the road one day after the 11 year deadline. Kelley asked whose responsibility it would be to install the road should the School District decide to develop it? It was determined that those concerns would be spelled out in the Developer's Agreement. Chairman Kelley was concerned about the safety aspect of the road at the time students make use of the property. Ms. Taylor said that the road would be near the High School, not the Elementary School. Kelley suggested a tunnel under Old Crystal Bay Road. Ms. Taylor thought that to be an excellent idea. Planning Commission member Johnson observed that any other use of the property would be a conditional use permit and the City would have an opportunity to review the use. Ms. Jo Haislet asked if there would be a way to rejoin the four lots to make one parcel? Bellows stated that the City would probably require the parcel be shown as one large parcel. Mabusth noted that this would involve a simple clerical procedure for lot combination once the vacation of all public interest is realized. Attorney Leung, asked that the Planning Commission approve