Laserfiche WebLink
MIMOTBS OP THE PIAmillG COIOaSSIOB !TIB6 SBPTBMBBR 19» 1988 <br />• l> •ZCmiWG FILE tl319-FDLLBR COHTI1I1 <br />Commission member Hanson, to table #1319. <br />Nays^O, Motion passed. <br />Motion, Ayes»5, <br />§1321 TOM HAISLBT <br />950 OLD CRTSTEL BAT ROAD NORTH <br />CLASS III PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />SECOND RBVIBN <br />The applicant, Tom Haislet was present, as was Lucy Taylor <br />from the School Board, Bill Fenholdt from School Administration, <br />and Tony Leung, the Attorney for the School District. Hr. Leung <br />presented this matter on behalf of the School District. <br />Mr. Leung explained that the School District was acquiring <br />the parcel as proposed because of the lack of capital funds <br />available to purchase the entire parcel at once. In addition, <br />the sellers wanted to sell the land in installments to avoid an <br />unnecessary tax burden. Further, the City of Orono prohibits the <br />School District from entering into an installment contract. It <br />was determined that the best procedure for purchasing the parcel <br />would be a lease with an option to purchase. <br />Mr. Leung reiterated the concerns expressed by the Planning <br />Commission as to the School District failing to purchase all of <br />the lots. The School District is in favor of placing an easement <br />in favor of the City of Orono for the purpose of a road on the <br />property. Mr. Leung's concern about the easement is that once <br />the School District has purchased the entire parcel, they would <br />need to come back before the City to obtain a vacation of the <br />easment. He suggested filing the perpetual easement contingent <br />upon the filing of the deed of conveyance for the parcel. Once <br />that deed of conveyance was filed, it would automatically trigger <br />a vacation of the easement. <br />Chairman Kelley asked how difficult it would be for the <br />School District to come back before the City for its vacation. <br />Planning Commission member Bellows Interjected that it was her <br />impression that the School District's presentation was strictly <br />for the purpose of obtaining direction to proceed as the City <br />requested. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that since the <br />time that was determined, the School District had become <br />concerned about the road easement in the future. Mabusth stated <br />that depending on development pressures to the east of the <br />property, the City could envision that road platted to the east <br />lot line. Ms. Taylor stated that she had not been warned about <br />the possibility of any development to the east disallowing the <br />School District to vacate the road. That would hamper the School <br />District's purchase of the parcel as a whole and would also <br />jeopardize the City of Orono's public safety standards. She had <br />not seen any instances where school districts have public roads <br />running through the school property. Kelley asked about the <br />possibility of the road being developed to the west. Cohen asked <br />whether a developer would take into account the fact that the