My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-15-1988 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
08-15-1988 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2023 8:47:39 AM
Creation date
9/14/2023 4:13:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MIHUTBS OF THE PLANNIHG COMMISSION i:«K-TING HELD AUGUST 15, 1988 <br />ZONING FILE #1314 CONTIN1 <br />removing the concrete patio at this time. Applicant stated that <br />he would still have the same problem with the ice. <br />Mr. Rowlette stated that the only reason they are in need of <br />this addtion is due to a new road being built directly across <br />from their kitchen. The addition will act as a screen from <br />headlights shining in their house from this new driveway. <br />Bellows stated that she had a prcbjlem with the appropriateness of <br />using the greenhouse addition as a screen for incoming 1 ght. <br />Applicant stated that the addition would be made of a dark <br />plexiglass material. Applicant stated that he had a problem <br />understanding why there should be any concern. They were not <br />asking to add to the hardcover and asked why he needed approval <br />to perform this addition. Bellows stated that the existing house <br />was so far outside of the boundaries. They had already put one <br />addition on and now they were requesting another addition. Mrs. <br />Rowlette stated that the addition was merely a rounded glass <br />window that extends 4 1/2* from the house. It is being added to <br />fill an existing space on the outside wall of the house. She <br />asked what more the Planning Commission would need to see. Brown <br />asked applicants whether they need the entire concrete patio to <br />take care of the ice build-up problem? Mr. Rowlette stated that <br />the patio was in two pieces and he could remove one part of it. <br />Kelley stated that understood the problem of trying to chip <br />ice from a wood surface. If applicants would be willing to <br />remove the^ portion of patio, he would approve the addition. <br />Bellows reiterated her concern about using a window to screen <br />light. Kelley asked applicant how a plexiglass window would <br />prevent headlights from shining in their kitchen window? Mrs. <br />Rowlette stated that the window would be a reflective, darkened <br />glass. Mr. Rowlette added that they would install trees and <br />bushes inside the greenhouse which would add to the screening <br />affect. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Brown, to recommend <br />approval of the addition of the 4 1/2* sunroom, subject to the <br />condition that the patio on the south side of the house be <br />removed up to the felt line, which is equal the location of the <br />deck and runs parallel to the house. The patio must be removed <br />before the permit for the sunroom is issued. Motion, Ayes»6, <br />Nays»0, Motion passed. <br />#1315 COUNTRYSIDE MANOR HOMEOHNERS* ASSOCIATION <br />INTERSECTION OF fflLLOM DRIVE AND COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE <br />VARIANCES <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:53 P.M. - 8:57 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing ware noted.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.