Laserfiche WebLink
MinUTBS OF THE PIAHHIHG COMNISSION NEBTIHG SBID JOLT 18, 1988 <br />#1305 WASHIH6TOH SCIBHTIFIC, IMC. <br />2605 NEST NATZATA BOULEVARD <br />COHDITIOHAL OSB PERMIT <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Mr. Joe Pallansch, a representative of Washington Scientific, was <br />present for this matter. <br />Mr. Kelley asked Applicant about his opinion as to what the Watershed <br />District wants to do. Mr. Pallansch referred to a letter from the <br />Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and their concern about run-off rates <br />increasing 4%. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the City would <br />work closely with the MCWD in determining the actual size of the pond <br />required for run-off. Mr. Pallansch stated that he would really like to <br />postpone this matter until further discussions took place. <br />It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Cohen to table #1305, Washington <br />Scientific, Inc., Conditional Use Permit. Motion, Ayes^^^, Mays^O, Motion <br />Carries. <br />#1306 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION <br />3280/3286 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />CONDITIONAL OSB PBRMIT/VARIAMCBS <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicants were not present for this matter but had requested that <br />this matter be tabled until a later date when the requested subdivision <br />application would also be reviewed. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter. <br />It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to table #1306 Metro Waste <br />Control Commission Conditional Use Permit/Variances. Motion, Ayes*6, <br />Nays^O, Motion passed. Johnson commented that he felt architectural <br />controls were necessary and that noise, odor and landscaping would be <br />additional issues needing attention. <br />#1307 DIANE AND DOUGLAS MERE <br />3195 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Merz were present for this matter. <br />Gaffron explained that the Applicants are requesting a variance to <br />side street setback in order to construct a deck. There was a previous <br />deck on the property. They are proposing a deck that would wrap around the <br />house. The property line is approximately 1' from the house which is <br />located about 20' from the paved portion of Leaf Street on that side. <br />There is a sidestreet setback requirement of 50' in this zone. He stated <br />8