Laserfiche WebLink
MIHDTBS OP THE PLAlffltllK: CX)MM1S6I(:TIHG HELD JULY 18, 1988 <br />#1303 ALLAN REZABEK-CONTINUED <br />property and was a factor in his decision to purchase the property. Mr. <br />Fisher stated that when the judicial markers were placed it was the first <br />time they realized that the fence was on their property. The Fishers have <br />just finished a remodeling project that added on a storage shed and garage <br />that brought the driveway down along the property line. They spent a <br />considerable amount of money for landscaping and feel that the fence <br />detracts from that. Is is their opinion that the fence creates a safety <br />hazard as it creates a blind intersection; All in all the fence is an <br />eyesore and a safety hazard and should not be reinstalled. <br />Mr. Rezabek stated that he is in the process of selling their house <br />and they have had several realtors and perspective buyers view the <br />property. No one has indicated that they dislike the fence, to the <br />contrary, they have had some compliments on the landscaping which was done <br />to compliment the fence. He does not believe the fence is a safety issue. <br />Commissioner Kelley asked Mr. Fisher as to his preference for the <br />fence up or down. Mr. Fisher responded he would like it down. When asked <br />he would be moving, Mr. Rezabek stated he would, if the house sells, and <br />added he would like to sell the house with the fence. Commissioner Brown <br />asked for clarification on the safety issue. <br />It was moved by Mr. Cohen, seconded by Mr. Kelley, to deny the <br />lakeshore setback variance application. Motion, Ayes»6, Nays*0, Motion <br />passed. <br />#1304 RICHARD BLOONQOIST/RICR'S SUPER VALU <br />3333 SBORBLIHB DRIVE <br />VARIANCES <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicant was not present for this matter. <br />Kelley stated that the Planning Commission is looking to approve a <br />street setback for a pylon sign due to the County Road 15 construction. <br />The additional right-of-way is being taken by the County. Kelley inquired <br />as to whether there would be a guardrail between the road sign and the <br />roadway. Mabusth replied that there is a 4' to 5* cement pathway and a <br />boulevard about 4* to 5', all in all approximately 10* of improvements. <br />There will also be a 1-1/2* curb that will border the entire area and will <br />take the overhang of the car bumpers. <br />Kelley reiterated that 20* is the required setback for parking and the <br />Applicant was requesting 0*. Mabusth stated that has been a procedure to <br />grant 10* street setback variances for parking in the Navarre area. <br />It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Moos, to recommend approval of <br />#1304 for a sign variance of 7* and a street setback of 20*. Mabusth added <br />that if the Applicant is planning on installing a new sign, he can only do <br />so upon approval of the City. This language was included in the Motion. <br />Motion, Ayes= 6, Nays-0, Motion passed.