07-18-1988 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MimjTBS OP THE PIAmiHG CXMUSSIOH V1H6 1 I .-1^1 JULY 18» 1988 #1207 GENE 7 CATHERINE SCANLON-CONTINUED Scanlon, per staff recommendation. Notion, Ayes-5, Nays-1, Motion passed. #1286 GARY RODERICK COHSTROCTIOli 1749 EORTH FARM ROAD VARIAMCE SECOND REVIEW Applicant was present for this matter. This is a continuation of a Public Hearing. The request is to build a 6’ high fence on the property along County Road 6. The proposed location of the fence is considered to be a front or sidestreet yard. There are some existing, but immature, trees and shrubs in this proposed fence location. Applicant's concerns are that children could r^n out onto County Road 6. Noise from County Road 6 is also a problem, as well as headlights from traffic travelling west on County Road 6. Adjacent property owners are concerned that a 6' fence does not fit into Orono's landscaping scheme of openness and natural fencing using vegetation. Applicant stated that in his opinion the fence would not create any sighting interference. Applicant went on to say that the property in question contains a now vacant residence, but he hopes to sell it in the near future. Prospective buyers have inquired about a fence and the Applicant is merely pursuing this matter to see whether fencing is a realistic idea. Applicant pointed out that the present fencing ordinance would allow him to put a fence on the south side of the property with no need for a variance whatsoever. He feels this is baclcward. Ben Field, an adjacent property owner, indicated that he is opposed to this variance. He believes the fence will detract from the natural openess of the area. All 7 houses in that area have been built so as to compliment the natural surroundings. "Farm at Long Lake” developer Timothy Adams reiterated Mr. Field's convictions. Commissioner Johnson concurred with Mr. Field and Mr. Adams regarding approval of this variance. Cohen stated that Applicant has the right to put up a 3-1/2 foot fence, which he thinks would alleviate any potential safety problems. The natural vegetation that exists on the property will grow and will provide a natural barrier. He is against a 6* fence. Applicant made a final comment about 6* fences that already exist in Orono. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Cohen to recommend denial of the variance #1286, Roderick Construction. Motion, Ayes»€, Mays»0, Notion passed. Kelley informed Applicant of his next procedural step which would be an appearance before the City Council. #1291 ALFRED IVERSON 2835 CASCO POINT ROAD REFERRAL BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION Applicants were not present. Mabusth explained that this was a referral back due to the possibility of the need for a height variance. She stated that staff was able to confirm that there is no need for a height variance. Mr. Kelley expressed his concern about the Iversons