My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-18-1988 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
07-18-1988 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2023 4:31:18 PM
Creation date
9/14/2023 4:12:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MIHDTBS OF THB PLAmiaG COMNISSIOH MTSTIHG JULY 18, 1988 <br />#1301 DAVID L. WHITE 6 FREDRICK C. WHITE-CONTINUT^D <br />concurred with Mr. Cohen's request for a topographic map. The PC has to be <br />sure that the development of this land is in line with the comprehensive <br />plan of the City. He felt it is important to limit access from County <br />Roads, especially 19, because that traffic will increase over time. <br />Commissioner Johnson agreed that a more comprehensive workup was needed as <br />to development alternatives for the property. <br />Kelley asked for further public comments, there were none. Johnson <br />questioned whether it was Hennepin County's position to limit access to the <br />County Roads involved as much as possible. Gaffron responded that although <br />they have not yet responded in this application, typically they would like <br />to limit as far as possible the number of accesses. It was moved by <br />Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to table #1301 pending Applicant's further <br />consideration of a comprehensive development plan and submittal of a <br />topographical map, and review by the City as to the position and cost of <br />the roadway. Motion, Ayes»6, Nays«0, Motion passed. <br />#1207 GBHB « CATHBRIHE SCAMLOM <br />2815 CATCO POINT ROAD <br />COHDITIORAL USB PERMIT t VARIABCB <br />THIRD REVIEW <br />Gene and Catherine Scanlon were present for this matter. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the Applicants were seeking <br />the replacement of structures that were damaged in the storm of July 23, <br />1987. The specific structures involve a lake shore deck, access stairs and <br />a 7' X 7' storage shed. Applicants now propose placing the storage shed <br />underneath the existing or proposed deck, which will allow for a reduction <br />in the hardcover from what was there prior to the storm. The total <br />hardcover for the proposed deck is 165 sq. ft. The plans have been <br />reviewed by the building inspector. <br />Commissioner Kelley asked what the 165 ft. included. Mabusth stated <br />it includes just the decking, and not the 149 sq. ft. of access stairs. <br />Kelley questioned recommendation #2 regarding plantings. Mabusth replied <br />that this procedure is very consistent with what they are now asking of all <br />persons who replace retaining walls in lakeshore yards. She noted that the <br />Applicants have volunteered to reduce hardcover within the 75-250' setback <br />area. Hanson commended the Applicants on making every effort to work on <br />this. Mabusth added that the Scanlons are going directly to the Council on <br />this. <br />In regard to the date the hardcover removals are to take place, Hanson <br />asked Applicants for a date they felt was realistic. Applicants replied <br />next Spring, and June 30, 1989, was agreed upon. The specific hardships <br />that apply in this particular variance are the extreme slope of the land <br />and the necessary work required to stabilize that area after the storm. <br />Johnson stated that he did not think this variance was consistent with <br />the 0'-75' policies in that there is a retaining wall, stairs, storage <br />structure and deck all within 25' of the Lake. It was moved by Hanson, <br />seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of #1207, Gene & Catherine
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.