Laserfiche WebLink
MiauTBS OF nx puuniiaG commxssiqh hbetik ibld Mikf li« <br />S . ■ ^ ‘ ' “/A-l. *► <br />■ ^ ji 5 <br />V ’t i' <br />«12tS DOHALD S. PBnXSOV <br />3048 aOMB 8B08B OKIVX <br />VJUUAMCB <br />FOBLIC HBARIK OslO-OtlS <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />were noted. <br />Donald Peterson was present for this Biatter. <br />Gaffron explained the request for a hardcover variance <br />in the 75-250' zone to construct room expansion to the <br />vest side of the house. He noted that the only <br />reasonable area where hardcover could be reeoved would <br />be in the driveway area, but not enough hardcover could <br />be removed to off-set the proposed increase and maintain <br />a functional driveway. <br />Kelley asked applicant what the hardship was for needing <br />the variance? <br />Mr. Peterson explained the need to relocate a bathroom <br />from the main entrance area to the proposed expanded <br />master bedroom area. <br />Bellows stated she understood the desire to improve the <br />property but felt the application lacked an exhibited <br />hardship to justify granting the variance. She notec <br />that the application did not include a sketch of the <br />existing interior of the house which would be helpful in <br />making a decision. <br />Mr. Peterson explained the existing interior of the <br />house. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Brown, seconded by Hanson, to recommend <br />approval of the hardcover variance as proposed per staff <br />recommendation finding the hardship being the <br />configuration of the lot precludes sufficient use of the <br />land within the 0-250' zone, subject to no additional <br />hardcover allowed on the property. <br />Kelley stated he felt torn on this application but felt <br />there was some validity to the above stated hardship. <br />Kelley and Bellows did not feel that removal of part of <br />the driveway back-up apron was practical in this case. <br />Bellows stated she would support this application <br />finding that there are some reasonable hardships related <br />to the lot.