My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-1988 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
03-21-1988 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2023 4:21:32 PM
Creation date
9/14/2023 4:11:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MiaOTB OP THE PtAlHiaG COMNISSlQll MBRllG IBLP HAICH 21» 19t8 <br />*1223 iiELmov coanaoED <br />Mr. Waldron did not feal that his proposal vould create <br />any adverse drainage problems to the adjacent <br />properties. He stated that the logical method to <br />solving the bank erosion problem is to remove the <br />overburdening soil which is supported by the HCO and <br />his engineer. He stated that his plan is basically <br />neutral in relation to other options except for the <br />visual impact. <br />Bellows explained that the visual impact issue is not <br />whether they like or dislike this specific proposal, <br />but to maintain a visual coherenci' to the lakeshore. <br />She noted that restoring the lakeshore bank can be done <br />without creating any visual impact. <br />Johnson asked about the material that washed down from <br />the lakeshore bank, were there any plans to reclaim <br />these soils, or just cut the 3* from the top? <br />Mr. Waldron stated that the soils slid into the lake <br />approximately 20’ and settled or washed away during the <br />summer. He did not plan to reclaim these soils. <br />Johnson, Bellows, and Kelley stated they could not <br />support the revised plan. <br />Brown stated he felt OK with the revised proposal taking <br />into consideration the Hennepin Conservation District <br />report, the fact that the visual impact is minimal, the <br />neutral long-term runoff impact. He would agree that <br />the cut should be made along the entire width of the <br />property. <br />Chairman Kelley noted the proposed hardcover increase. <br />Gaffron explained the proposed 1.41% hardcover increase <br />in the 0-75'. <br />Chairman Kelley stated he did not have any problem with <br />the proposed deck but felt the hardcover percentage <br />should remain the same. <br />Mr. Waldron noted way that he could achieve no net <br />hardcover increase and agreed he would do this. <br />Because of the Planning Commission majority opposed to <br />the revised plan, Kelley asked Mr. Waldron if he would <br />like his request tabled so he can submit another revised <br />plan?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.