My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-18-1996 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
11-18-1996 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2023 3:45:14 PM
Creation date
9/14/2023 3:39:14 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
350
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />To:Chair Lindquist and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Adminis* <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Michael P. GafTron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />November 14, 1996 <br />Subject:#2197 John O'Sullivan, 2380/2420 Shad) wood Road - Vacation of Portion of <br />Navarre Lane - Public Hearing <br />Pertinent Ordinance <br />Section 10.12 - Vacation of streets, alleys and public grounds. <br />Lbt of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B <br />C <br />D <br />E <br />F <br />G <br />H <br />I <br />J <br />Legal Notice <br />Plat Map <br />Certificate of Mailing/Propert)’ Owners List <br />Location Map <br />Zoning Code Section 10.12 <br />Letter from US West Communications <br />Letter from North Central CBA <br />C.xisting Site Plaa^roposed Site Plan <br />Staff Sketches; Pedestrian/Bike Path Options <br />Street Vacation Request <br />Applicant proposes a vacation of the portions of Navarre Lane between County Road 19 and <br />Olive Avenue which were not vacated earlier this year. Vacation of the 33' adjacent to the <br />Culver’s site (Phase I) was approved by the Council in May 1996, but at that time Council <br />rejected the idea of a full vacation, based on a desire to maintain potential access via the <br />remaining unimproved/unused right-of-way. Council indicated the right-of-way should be <br />retained for possible future pedestrian or bike trail needs. <br />Applicant has provided the City with the necessary drainage and utility easements over the <br />portion of right-of-way that was vacated. If the City agrees to vacating the remainder, the City <br />will require applicant to provide not only drainage and utility easements over the remainder, <br />but also a trail easement somewhere on the property, of a width and location acceptable to the <br />City. <br />Necessary Findings for Vacation <br />In order to recommend approval of the vacation of public right-of-way. Planring Commission <br />should be able to make the following findings: <br />f <br />i <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.