Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1989^ <br />ZONING PILE #1475-MCDOWELL CONTIN1 <br />Planning Commissioner Bellows suggested that Mr. McDowell's <br />existing homestead lot access be used rather than making an <br />additional curb cut. <br />Mr. Chip Hayssen, 4135 Bayside Road, asked if there was a <br />specific reason that the lot line rearrangement and subdivision <br />had to be a combined effort? He questioned whether it would be <br />possible to proceed with the lot line rearrangement to Council? <br />Gaffron and Mabusth said that was something that would need <br />to be looked into further and that it would be necessary to have <br />such a request in writing from Mr. McDowell and Mr. Hayssen. <br />Mr. McDowell indicated that he would rather keep the <br />subdivision and lot line rearrangement together. <br />There were no further comments from the public regarding <br />this matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />Commissioner Hanson, to table this application, pending the <br />outcome of easement and a possible revision of the subdivision if <br />Mr. McDowell wished to do so. Kelley said that he would prefer <br />to see the existing driveway (shown on the survey as "Bayside <br />Ridge") used for access. Planning Commissioners Bellows and <br />Brown indicated that they too would prefer to see "Bayside Ridge" <br />used, but were not certain whether it would be possible in this <br />case. Planning Commissioner Hanson was uncertain of whether <br />"Bayside Ridge" was the best access. Motion, Ayes“4, Nays*0, <br />Motion passed. <br />*1289 ROBERT WILL <br />115 OLD CRYSTAL BAT ROAD NORTH <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - REVIEW OP AMENDED PLAN <br />RENOTIPICATION BY NAIL <br />Mr. and Mrs. Will were present for the review of the amended <br />plan for this preliminary subdivision. <br />Chairman Kelley confirmed that renotification by mail had in <br />fact occurred. Mabusth indicated that it had. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth provided a brief history of <br />this application for a 3-lot subdivision. She said that the <br />issue of the use of private property over which the City has an <br />underlying easement was reviewed by the City Attorney. Mabusth <br />said that the City could provide a developer with the authority <br />to construct a roadway through Rolling Meadows due to an existing <br />easement. Mabusth said that in light of this, Mr. Will is now <br />able to proceed with his subdivision, with a specific directive <br />that the existing private road be extended through his property <br />to a newly defined cul-de-sac. Mabusth clarified that the road <br />would be public, rather than private, and could be maintained by <br />the private homeowners association.