Laserfiche WebLink
MIHUTBS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETHK. NOVEMBER 20, 1989 <br />M *ZONING FILE «1479-lfILLIAMS CONTIM1 <br />Mr. Williams said that he would like to have an opportunity <br />to talk with the Hoffmans. <br />Bellows informed Mr. Williams that it would be unwise of him <br />to think that the Planning Commission will recommend approval of <br />this application based solely on the Hoffman's acceptance. <br />Bellows said that she was disinclined to approve this unless the <br />height of the building goes down or she is supplied with hard <br />numbers proving that the Hoffman's will not be impacted. <br />Hanson said that he is less inclined to look at the Issues <br />in the saune light as Bellows because the house is being built in <br />nominally the same site. He thou9ht that it was a terrible waste <br />to tear down the Stielow's house, but that is his opinion. He <br />said that he had serious reservations about the other variances. <br />There were no further comments from the public regarding <br />this matter and the public hearing was continued. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />Commissioner Brown, to table this application. Brown and Hanson <br />indicated they would look favorably upon the proposal if the <br />Hoffman's have no objections, Kelley said that he would approve a <br />lakeshore setback if the house is single-story; Bellows wants to <br />see the facts, the elevation of Hoffman's first floor, elevation <br />of the proposed house and height of various peaks. She said that <br />is the only way she would consider granting the average lakeshore <br />setback variance. Ms. Marge Gasch, 1030 Tonkawa Road, indicated <br />that the proposed deck will extend beyond the site lines of her <br />house, but other than that she had no comments. Motion, Ayes«4, <br />Nays*0, Motion passed. <br />*1480 ED t GBRTA TOTH <br />725 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOOTH <br />VACATION OF DRAINAGE BASEMENTS <br />PUBLIC HEARING 12:00 P.M. TO 12:05 P.H. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Toth were not present for ’his public hearing. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Planning Commissioner Hanson, seconded by <br />Planning Commissioner Brown, to recommend approval of application <br />#1480, per staff's recommendation. Gaffron asked for comments <br />regarding the .9' setback variance for the deck? Hanson said <br />that he had no problem with that. Gaffron noted that the <br />applicants' contractor had indicated if the variance was not <br />approved, they would revise the deck proposal to meet the <br />setbacks. The general consensus of the Planning Commission was <br />change the deck. Hanson incorporated that into his motion. Brown <br />seconded. Motion, Ayes»4, Nays=0, Motion passed.