Laserfiche WebLink
nmins of ns plmdiifg cohmissioh mbbtiiig juni 19« i$il <br />SOaiK FIUB •1405-OOUIBLL COWIBOBU <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was noved by Planning Comnissioner Johnson, seconded by <br />Planning Comiissioner Cohen, to reconnend approval of application <br />#1405, per staff reconmendations 1 through 5. Motion. Ayes«5, <br />Nays*0, Motion passed. <br />#1414 TBIPLB ISKABL <br />645 TOnAMA ROAD <br />OOMDinOHAL USB PBRMIT <br />PUBLIC BBABIB6 9t26 P.M. TO 9t35 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Mr. Janes Cohn was present as a representative for Temple <br />Israel/Camp Teko. <br />Building Official Jacobs informed the Planning Commission <br />that the present use of Camp Teko will not change. The applicant <br />is proposing to construct a multi-use facility that would consist <br />of conference rooms and dormitory areas to serve the existing <br />camp use. In total, 6 modules will be constructed, 3 now and 3 <br />at a later time. The applicant has agreed to meet the required <br />number of parking stalls (11), though their Initial plan allowed <br />for only 10. When the other 3 modules are completed, applicant <br />agrees to provide one additional parking stall. The City <br />Engineer has reviewed the access point and has recommended that <br />the entrance centerline be moved 10' southeast so that it would <br />be at a right angle. <br />Mr. Darel Leipold, 678 Tonkawa Road, was very impressed with <br />the camp and was pleased with the proposal being presented this <br />evening. <br />There was discussion between applicant and Jacobs regarding <br />parking along the proposed firelane. <br />There were no further comments from the public regarding <br />this matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Acting Chairperson Bellows to table this <br />matter until the pending^issues of access and parking are better <br />planned and documented. Mr. Cohn indicated that he would prefer <br />to proceed on to Council with this matter. Jacobs indicated that <br />he was comfortable with the documentation he presently had and <br />did not feel it was necessary to table this application. (There <br />being no second to this motion, it failed. <br />It was moved by Planning Commissioner Brown, seconded by <br />Planning Commissioner Cohen, subject to staff recommendations and <br />conditioned upon the applicant having the required information <br />and exhibits submitted prior to the July 10, 1989 Council <br />Meeting. Motion, Ayes«4, Bellows, May, due to the lack of <br />documentation for the commercial site plan review. Motion