Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
MIMmS OF TBB PLAmiMS C0MNI88I0V NBIFIIIG JURE 19, 1989 <br />n <br />tOHIRG PIU fl414-CMIP TBKO CCMTIRI <br />passed. <br />#1415 SOBBRT 4 CBBSTL BOMPHKBT <br />669 Ml—ETOlIRA BX6IILJUn> LMB <br />VlUtlMiCB8 <br />PUBLIC HBMtlliG 9»37 P.M. - 9*55 P.M. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Husiphrey were present for this public hearing. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailino were duly noted. ^ <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron <br />explained the applicants' proposal. The applicant is proposlnq <br />to increase hardcover in the 75-250* sone to 42.2%. Existinq <br />hardcover in the 75-250* zone is 37.1% which includes the <br />existing driveway, rock and plastic areas. The applicant has <br />indicated that some of the rock has no plastic underlining and <br />some of the plastic that does exist is deteriorating. The <br />applicants wish to replace their existing deck at this time, and <br />add a pool at a later date. The applicants are aware of the fact <br />that should they not add the pool within one year from the <br />renewal*^ of this application, they will need to seek a <br />The applicants also require an average lakeshore variance. <br />Mr. Humphrey apprised Gaffron earlier of an error in a survey of <br />the house on an adjacent lot. Mr. Humphrey contends that the <br />house was actually placed closer to the lake than the file survey <br />shows. This would move the average lakeshore setback so that the <br />Humphreys pool would only encroach 10* rather than 30* into the <br />lakeshore setback area. Gaffron said that there have been no <br />adverse comments from neighboring property owners regarding this <br />application. <br />Acting Chairperson Bellows said that normally an inground <br />pool 18 not considered to be a significant average lakeshore <br />encroachment because it does not impede sight lines. <br />Mr. Humphrey said that it was important to have the pool <br />area at a later time because they have young children. The deck <br />they are proposing to construct at this time is 370 s.f. Mr. <br />Humphrey said that there is a large open field that collects and <br />distributes most of the runoff so that it is not directed toward <br />the Mr. Humphrey said that when the pool is constructed, <br />they will not construct the stairway or landscaping now shown in <br />their plans. He said that the pool would be located <br />approximately 5* closer to the house than indicated on the plans. <br />Acting Chairperson Bellows asked Mr. Humphrey what exactly <br />he wanted the Planning Commission to approve. She said that he <br />had indicated that the pool plans as presented were not what he <br />intended to do. Bellows said that she could not recommend <br />circumstance. Bellows observed that the applicants driveway and turn-around area were quite