My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-21-1989 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
02-21-1989 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2023 8:50:35 AM
Creation date
9/13/2023 3:30:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MivuTBS OP TBE puunnws 0»flllSSI(»rtlWG PBBROJUIT 21, 19S9 <br />SOaiHG PILE •1370-SnBL0W/SI8K CORIHUBD <br />DNR, however, view applications based upon existing conditions. <br />This application does not reflect the improvement of an existing <br />riparian property. <br />Mr. Sisk indicated that he would prefer tabling this item <br />until he had an opportunity to review the new information noted <br />in the staff review with his attorney. <br />There were no comments from the pub3.io regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />Commissioner Bellows to table this application. Notion, Ayes*6, <br />Nays»0, Motion passed. <br />#1372 DONALD OMPP <br />1180 NOKn AKN DEIPB <br />CLASS II PULIMIHAKT SOBDIVISIOH <br />PUBLIC HBAKIB6 7:42 P.M. - 7x45 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />The applicant was present for this matter. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth gave a brief description of Mr. <br />Kempf's proposal for a Class II, Preliminary Subdivision. The <br />construction of a residence has already begun on Lot 1, and <br />access has been approved by Hennepin County. The status of the <br />nonconforming structure on Lot 2 must be addressed in this <br />subdivision review. The City Engineer has recononended that a 30* <br />drainage easement be taken through the existing drainage way that <br />comes in from the north and west. Mabusth further stated that <br />the proposed access drive/curb cut at Loma Linda Avenue be moved <br />25* further west to improve sighting distance. There is also a <br />portion of the travelled roadway that still is not within defined <br />the right-of-way and the City Engineer is recommending that a 25* <br />legged triangle be taken as additional right-ofjway. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />Commissioner Cohen, to recommend approval of this application <br />with the flowage and drainage easements as set forth by the City <br />Engineer on Lots 1 and 2; the dedication of the right-of-way on <br />Lot 2 at the south quadrant; the proposed access/curb cut a^ Loma <br />Linda Avenue be moved 25* to the west to improve the sight line <br />distance; and the existing cabin on Lot 2 shall be removed at the <br />time a building permit is issued or September 1, 1989, vnichever <br />may occur first. Motion, Ayes=6, Nays«0, Motion passed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.