Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 17, 1989 <br />»l :-t»ZOHIMG PILE «1363-BBRRT CONTIW <br />allowing variances for a new residence. She felt that a walk-out <br />should only occur as a result of the existing topography of the <br />lot, otherwise another plan should be used. This would be <br />especially true if grading in the 0-75' zone were necessary to <br />achieve a walk-out. Mr. Berry explained that the walk-out would <br />not create that much difference than the existing basement. <br />Mr. Rod Lund, the Developer for the Berry's, presented <br />photographs showing the existing residence, garage and the oak <br />tree. He gave a brief description of what he was proposing to <br />accomplish. Planning Commissioner Hanson did not believe the <br />proposed house fit well with the site. <br />Hanson questioned whether the oak tree would survive the <br />construction. Mr. Lund had consulted a professional who informed <br />him that the tree would bend toward its roots, hence this tree <br />appeared to have its main roots away from the area to be <br />disturbed. He also had an estimate from a tree service that <br />valued such a tree at $4,400.00. Planning Commissioner Johnson <br />believed that any grading that occurred would threaten the oak <br />tree. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown said that the Planning <br />Commission had been fairly consistent in making new structures <br />conform. Johnson commented that Baldur Park Road was a unique <br />area that seemed to consistently require variances. However, due <br />to the 3/4 acres that the Berrys had to work with, he did not <br />believe there should be a need for variances. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by <br />Planning Commissioner Moos, to table this item. Kelley provided <br />some direction for the applicants. The Planning Commission did <br />not want to see any hardcover or cutting and filling on the north <br />side in the 0-75'. Within the 0-75' zone on the south side the <br />attached garage must be offset by removal of the detached garage. <br />Mr. Berry expressed his desire to build a three-car garage if the <br />detached garage had to be removed. Within the 75-250' zone it <br />was the concensus of the Planning Commission not to allow more <br />than 30% hardcover. They also wanted the applicants to adhere to <br />the average lakeshore setback. Bellows informed the applicants <br />that compliance with the Planning Commission's requests would <br />cause a substantial reduction in the size of the house. Kelley <br />suggested that a footprint be drawn prior to an actual house <br />plan. The applicant questioned the Planning Commission's opinion <br />regarding the walk-out. Kelley stated that they would not allow <br />a walk-out to be cut on the north side if it required grading in <br />the 0-75* zone. The natural contours of the property must <br />remain. Motion, Ayes=7, Nays*0, Motion passed.