01-17-1989 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 17, 198^ 11HIZONING PILE «1362-HAOSBR CONTIN1 the applicant if he had discussed this proposal with his neighbors? Mr. Hauser replied that he had and the neighbor to the south had no objections. Mr. Schoenwetter explained that the neighbor to the north had no opinion, mainly because he was selling his house and moving to Florida. Bellows commented that the "leap frogging" circumstance was typically considered when reviewing average lakeshore setbacks. She questioned what would happen to the property directly north of Mr. Hauser's. Gaffron depicted the lakeshore setbacks for the properties to the north. Kelley observed that if one were to draw a line between the two houses on the north to the south, it would run out into the lake. The same would occur on the south side. This is typical of properties located on points or peninsula's, as is this prop«»rty. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Cohen, to recommend approval of application #1362, subject to a hardcover reduction of 417 s.f. from whatever source available, and to approve the average lakeshore setback as defined. The hardships of this application would be the property being located on the point and the addition being 160' from the lakeshore. Motion, Ayes=7, Nays=0, Motion passed. ^ #1363 ROGER 6 BECKY BERRY 1392 BALDOR PARK ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 8:42 P.M. ~ 8:55 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. The applicants were present for this matter. As explained by Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron, the Berry's were seeking variances in order to demolish an existing residence and rebuild. Currently the hardcover on the property consists of a detached garage, as well as a driveway that continues uphill to the existing house. The proposal calls for a new residence with a porch, deck and attached garage. The driveway would remain in the same area, but would become slightly steeper. It is the intention of the Berry's to maintain the detached garage. In order to access the new, attached garage, it will be necessary to raise a portion of the yard by bringing in fill in the south 0-75' zone. The Berry's are proposing a walk out which will requ^e grading to be done within the north 0-75' zone. One of the reasons the Berry's preferred not to locate the house further back to meet the average setback, is to preserve a mature red oak tree. Gaffron said it would be necessary to make a 2' cut in order to achieve the walk-out. Planning Commissioner Bellows expressed her reservations of 8