Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2134 <br />May 16, 1996 <br />Page 3 <br />Total hardcover original!) approved, 1 ‘'84: 2775 s.f. <br />Total hardcover approved, 1991; 5080 s.f. <br />Total hardcover as of May 1996, excluding proposed partially built deck: 5352 s.f <br />Proposed deck, net hardcover: <br />Proposed sidewalk/'landscape revisions, net hardcover: <br />Proposed drivevvay hardcover reduction: <br />Net proposed hardcover changes; <br />+ 165 s.f <br />+ 54 s.f <br />• 254 s.f. <br />. 35s.f <br />Proposed Final Hardcover: <br />0-75': <br />75-250’; <br />315 s.f ( 4.9®/o) <br />5002 s.f (45.1%) <br />Planning Commission may wish to review the 1991 approval resolution. It raises two specific <br />important points; <br />1. In Finding No. 3(e), Planning Commission found that the existing driveway (as it exists <br />today) provides the necessary safety level for vehicular use on a busy County Road. For that <br />reason. Planning Commission felt it was not appropriate or necessary to reduce the size of <br />the driveway , '• 'lich reduction is currently proposed. <br />2. Condition No. 2 stated that "The City will approve no further encroachment of the principal <br />structure (this includes decks) within the lakeshore yard. " The meaning of this condition is <br />unclear, however, the Planning Commission Minutes of April 15, 1991 suggest that no <br />additional hardcover should be approved for the property April 22, 1991 Council Minutes <br />do not shed any more light on this. <br />Lakeshore Stairway <br />The 1991 staff memo noted that the lakeshore stairw ay was in disrepair and would have to meet <br />current standards of maximum 4’ width, maximum 4’x4 ’ landings. That stairway has since been <br />rebuilt without a permit, at a width of 3' on the 19* long stairway portion with a 6'xl3' landing along <br />the shoreline. That stairway/landing system is technically not in compliance with code, comprising <br />135 s.f of hardcover where a compliant stairway would be approximately 90-100 s.f in area. <br />Average Lakeshore Setback <br />After further review (see topographic map. Exhibit N) it has been determined that the proposed deck <br />will not encroach on the average lakeshore setback as defined by the neighboring adjacent <br />residences.